Abstract:Innovation is about more than technological invention. It involves change of many kinds: cultural, organisational and behavioural as well as technological. So, in a world crying out for social justice and ecological care, innovation holds enormous progressive potential. Yet there are no guarantees that any particular realised innovation will necessarily be positive. Indeed, powerful forces 'close down' innovation in the directions favoured by the most privileged interests. So harnessing the positive transformative potential for innovation in any given area, is not about optimizing some single self; evidently progressive trajectory in a 'race to the future'. Instead it is about collaboratively exploring diverse and uncertain pathways – in ways that deliberately balance the spurious effects of incumbent power. In other words, what are needed are more realistic, rational and vibrant 'innovation democracies'. Yet conventional innovation policy and regulation tend simply to assume that whatever products or technologies are most energetically advanced, are in some way self evidently beneficial. Scrutiny tends to be through narrow forms of quantitative 'risk assessment', focusing only on particular direct risks and asking merely whether they are 'tolerable' – often at a time too late for significant change. Technologies are typically privileged over other innovations. Attention is directed only in circumscribed ways at the pace of innovation. The result is a serious neglect for the crucial issue of the direction of innovation in any given area – and increased vulnerability to various kinds of 'lock in'. These patterns show up across all sectors. Beyond genetically modified (GM) crops, for example, there exist many other innovations for improving global food sustainability. But the relatively! low! potential for narrow commercial benefits often leave many promising options seriously neglected. With uncertainties side lined or interpreted in expedient ways, even scientific evidence itself can carry the imprint of vested interests. And official statistics often conceal the extent to which patterns of support are concentrated in favour of particular innovation pathways. Yet these effects of power remain under-acknowledged in policy making. Policy is stated simply as 'pro innovation' – as if this were a purely technical matter and always self-evidently good, rather than politically contestible. To address these challenges, innovation policy should more explicitly and transparently acknowledge the inherently political nature of the interests and motivations driving contending possible pathways. Here, this paper explores the potential for three emerging bodies of practice, relevant across all areas: participation, responsibility and precaution. Each involves a range of practical methods, catalysing and reinforcing new institutional forms. Due to its efficacy in resisting political bias, precaution is a subject of particular misunderstanding and mischief. Among other qualities, this offers a crucial guard against the error of treating the absence of evidence of harm as evidence of absence of harm – and highlights the importance of wider human and environmental values.Together, qualities of participation, responsibility and precaution help 'open up' scrutiny and accountability beyond anticipated consequences alone, to also interrogate the driving purposes of innovation. They allow societies to exercise agency not only over the rate and riskiness of innovation, but also over its direction. And they offer means to enable hither to more distributed and marginal forms of innovation – which presently manage only rarely (like renewable energy or ecological farming) to struggle to major global scale. Together, these qualities celebrate that innovation is not a matter for fear-driven technical imperatives, but requires a democratic politics of contending hopes.

Innovation in foods and personal care products: an interview with Gail Civille

FOSTERING A LINK BETWEEN CREATIVITY AND CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE: ESSENTIAL FACTORS FOR ADVANCING INNOVATIONS IN FOOD INDUSTRY

Spark innovation through empathic design

Academia-industry Innovation Interaction: Paradigm Shifts and Avenues for the Future

Picking winners. Interview by Diane Coutu

Consumer-driven definition of traditional food products and innovation in traditional foods. A qualitative cross-cultural study

Food Neophobia or Distrust of Novelties? Exploring Consumers’ Attitudes toward GMOs, Insects and Cultured Meat

Eureka!: What Is Innovation, How Does It Develop, and Who Does It?

Towards Innovation Democracy? Participation, Responsibility and Precaution in Innovation Governance.

Which research in design creativity and innovation? Let us not forget the reality of companies

Cooking under Fire: Managing Multilevel Tensions between Creativity and Innovation in Haute Cuisine

Managing the Culinary Innovation Process: The Case of New Product Development

Animal and human innovation: novel problems and novel solutions

Variety is the Spice of Innovation: Mediating Factors in the Service Idea Generation Process

A Biological Adaptability Approach to Innovation for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): Strategic Insights from and for Health-Promoting Agri-Food Innovation

Trends of Using Sensory Evaluation in New Product Development in the Food Industry in Countries That Belong to the EIT Regional Innovation Scheme

How to Manage Radical Innovation

Cultivating curiosity: Consumer responses to ethical and product benefits in cultured foods

The Value of Transparency for Designing Product Innovations

Creativity and Innovation in Health Care: Tapping Into Organizational Enablers Through Human-Centered Design

Innovating with brains: the psychology of open innovation