Diagnostic value of random urine protein/creatinine ratio for preeclampsia
Jingjing Guo,Lianlian Zhou,Suzhen Pan,Baoqing Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2023.e00351
2023-12-13
Abstract:Objective: The 24-h urine protein remains the gold standard to diagnose proteinuria in suspected preeclamptic patients. However, this test is time consuming and sometimes inaccurate. In this study, we aimed to analyse the correlation between the random urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) and 24-h urine protein and to explore the clinical value of UPCR in the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Method: We retrospectively evaluated 109 pregnant women from our hospital who had hypertensive diseases. They were grouped according to time of urine collection and disease severity to compare differences in random urine protein, urine creatinine, and UPCR. The correlation between the UPCR and 24-h urine protein was determined by Pearson's linear correlation. Results: We found no statistically significant differences in random urine protein, urine creatinine, or UPCR among the four time of sampling groups. Further, random urine protein, UPCR, and 24-h urine protein between the gestational hypertension and preeclampsia groups differed significantly (P < 0.001). Correlation analysis showed significant positive correlation between random urine protein, and 24-h urine protein, and UPCR and 24-h urine protein, with r values of 0.789 and 0.810, respectively. According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the optimal threshold, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of UPCR for the diagnosis of preeclampsia were 0.456 g/mmol, 67.8 %, 78.3 %, and 0.747, respectively (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.844). Conclusion: This study indicated that UPCR is significantly correlated with 24-h urine protein and is expected to replace the 24-h urine protein test as a diagnostic indicator of preeclampsia.