Abstract:Purpose Hofstede’s model of national culture has enjoyed enormous popularity but rests partly on faith. It has never been fully replicated and its predictive properties have been challenged. The purpose of this paper is to provide a test of the model’s coherence and utility. Design/methodology/approach Analyses of secondary data, including the World Values Survey, and a new survey across 56 countries represented by nearly 53,000 probabilistically selected respondents. Findings Improved operationalizations of individualism-collectivism (IDV-COLL) suggest it is a robust dimension of national culture. A modern IDV-COLL index supersedes Hofstede’s 50 year-old original one. Power distance (PD) seems to be a logical facet of IDV-COLL, rather than an independent dimension. Uncertainty avoidance (UA) lacks internal reliability. Approval of restrictive societal rules and laws is a facet of COLL and is not associated with national anxiety or neuroticism. UA is not a predictor of any of its presumed main correlates: importance of job security, preference for a safe job, trust, racism and xenophobia, subjective well-being, innovation, and economic freedom. The dimension of masculinity-femininity (MAS-FEM) lacks coherence. MAS and FEM job goals and broader values are correlated positively, not negatively, and are not related to the MAS-FEM index. MAS-FEM is not a predictor of any of its presumed main correlates: achievement and competition orientation, help and compassion, preference for a workplace with likeable people, work orientation, religiousness, gender egalitarianism, foreign aid. After a radical reconceptualization and a new operationalization, the so-called “fifth dimension” (CWD or long-term orientation) becomes more coherent and useful. The new version, called flexibility-monumentalism (FLX-MON), explains the cultural differences between East Asian Confucian societies at one extreme and Latin America plus Africa at the other, and is the best predictor of national differences in educational achievement. Research limitations/implications Differences between subsidiaries of a multinational company, such as IBM around 1970, are not necessarily a good source of knowledge about broad cultural differences. A model of national culture must be validated across a large number of countries from all continents and its predictions should withstand various plausible controls. Much of Hofstede’s model (UA, MAS-FEM) fails this test while the remaining part (IDV-COLL, PD, LTO) needs a serious revision. Practical implications Consultancies and business schools still teach Hofstede’s model uncritically. They need to be aware of its deficiencies. Originality/value As UA and MAS-FEM are apparently misleading artifacts of Hofstede’s IBM data set, a thorough revision of Hofstede’s model is proposed, reducing it to two dimensions: IDV-COLL and FLX-MON.

Relation between big five personality traits and Hofstede's cultural dimensions

Relationships between Big Five personality traits and individual-level cultural components

Personality and Culture Revisited: Linking Traits and Dimensions of Culture

Examining the impact of Culture's consequences: A three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede's cultural value dimensions.

Personality and espoused cultural differences in technostress creators

Big Five personality traits in the workplace: Investigating personality differences between employees, supervisors, managers, and entrepreneurs

Hofstede's Culture Dimensions

Measuring Hofstede's Five Dimensions of Cultural Values at the Individual Level: Development and Validation of CVSCALE

Personality Correlates of the Four-Factor Model of Cultural Intelligence

Study shows how cognitive style and personality of leaders determine what they are good at

A revision of Hofstede’s model of national culture: old evidence and new data from 56 countries

Social Network Behavior as Indicator of Personality, Motivation and Cultural Values

The fundamentals of Indian personality: An investigation of the big five

Linking the Big Five Personality Constructs to Organizational Justice

Big Five Personality Factors and Facets as Predictors of Openness to Diversity

Psychometric Validation of the Scale of Individual Cultural Values (CVSCALE) in Indian Context (Private and Public Leaders in Indian Organizations)

A test of Hofstede's model of culture following his own approach

Big Five Personality Traits and Their Impact on Job Performance of Managers in FMCG Sector

Three or five personality dimensions? An analysis of natural language terms in two cultures

Personality Traits and Types in Relation to Career Success: An Empirical Comparison Using the Big Five

Individual differences in importance ratings of Chinese values and their associations with the Big Five of personality in Western and Eastern populations