Decentering the Study of Migration Governance in the Mediterranean

Federica Zardo,Sarah Wolff
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1978944
IF: 2.872
2021-10-05
Geopolitics
Abstract:To what extent can a decentred approach improve our understanding of migration governance? In the field of public policy, it 'highlights the diverse and contingent meanings that inform the actions of the individuals involved in all kinds of practices of rule' (Bevir 2016, 232). In this special issue we engage indeed not only with decentring the institutions and actors involved, but also the meanings produced, narratives constructed as well as the practices they entail. Applied to the context of international relations and political geography, decentring pays attention to actors´ perceptions and practices that shape the negotiation process (El Qadim 2018; İşleyen 2018b). It also normatively engages with deconstructing dominant assumptions in the study of world politics (Bilgin 2017). In their call for a paradigm shift in the study of the European Union (EU)'s international relations, Fisher Onar and Nicolaïdis argue that decentring involves, first, unpacking "the social scientific categories, assumptions and paradigm that underpin Eurocentric truth claims" and then "engaging with the assumptions and worldviews that underpin others' accounts" (Onar and Nicolaïdis 2013, 286).
political science,geography
What problem does this paper attempt to address?