Infographic. Multiligament knee injury (MLKI): an expert consensus statement on nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation
Iain Robert Murray,Navnit S Makaram,Chryssa Neo,Andrew G Geeslin,Jorge Chahla,Gilbert Moatshe,Kay Crossley,Michelle E Kew,Aileen Davis,Maria Tuca,Hollis Potter,Dina C Janse van Rensburg,Carolyn A Emery,SeungPyo Eun,Hege Grindem,Frank R Noyes,Robert G Marx,Chris Harner,Bruce A Levy,Enda King,James L Cook,Daniel B Whelan,George F Hatch,Christopher J Wahl,Kristian Thorborg,James J Irrgang,Nicolas Pujol,Michael J Medvecky,Michael J Stuart,Aaron J Krych,Lars Engebretsen,James P Stannard,Peter MacDonald,Romain Seil,Gregory C Fanelli,Travis G Maak,K Donald Shelbourne,Evert Verhagen,Volker Musahl,Michael T Hirschmann,Mark D Miller,Robert C Schenck,Robert F LaPrade
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-109051
IF: 18.4793
2024-12-02
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Abstract:Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) represent a heterogeneous spectrum of pathology. Clinical evaluation, diagnosis and management of these injuries remains controversial. In order to assess the existing literature evaluating the diagnosis and management of MLKIs, we performed a scoping review1 based on established methodology.2 3 This process established that the majority of the 417 articles identified relating to MLKI were composed of small retrospective studies, 30% were composed of narrative reviews presenting no original data and only 1% of articles represented level 1 evidence.1 Overall, 70% of included studies were published within the last 12 years, with over half (57%) originating from the USA.1 The lack of diversity within author and patient groups that comprise MLKI research was highlighted. Consistently contentious themes within MLKI management were highlighted, including nomenclature, choice of imaging, timing of surgical intervention, operative versus non-operative management...
sport sciences