Abstract:The purpose of the research is to analyse the convergence of the concept of ‘breach of contract’ as construed under common law and civil law and to identify potential paths for further development of civil law in this field. I find that the common law’s approach to breach of contract is better suited to meet the needs of sophisticated contracting parties and that certain signs of civil law’s move towards the common law approach should be viewed as an indication of a general trend. Common law traditionally applies a broad and uniform notion of breach of contract. It encompasses circumstances that would not fall within the scope of the ‘non-performance of an obligation’ under civil law. The reason therefore is that civil law’s contractual liability is conditioned upon a breach of a pre-existing primary obligation to perform. Any other sort of contractual liability, which is not attached to a breach of a primary performance obligation, needs to be construed under different liability theories. Conversely, under common law the liability for breach of contract does not require a violation of a primary performance obligation; therefore, it can apply also in cases where it is not possible to construe any primary duty of performance. This is particularly the case of warranties. Ultimately, what can be handled under common law with the uniform concept of breach of contract, under civil law may require separate liability theories (indemnity-type liability), which are redundant in common law. Recent developments in civil law, however, provide clear signs of convergence between the civil law’s and common law’s liability theories. Two examples I use for my research is the ‘non-conformity’ under modern European sales law and the evolving approach to initial impossibility. I find that they signal a move towards the common law’s approach, as they attach liability for breach of contract to cases where there may be no primary performance obligation. **I claim that these examples should be viewed as an indication for a general trend, which would meet the expectations of professional contracting parties. Even though these statutory examples may appear isolated, the pattern of practice in complex contracting clearly demonstrates the relevance of developing a reliable liability theory for cases, where there may be no primary duty of performance. Both legal certainty and flexibility would benefit from one liability theory which would include promises not giving rise to any primary duty of performance. Finally, I discuss potential ways in which civil law could integrate these cases in its general liability theory.

European Civil Liability Law outside Europe. The Example of the Big Three: China, Brazil, Russia

The Development of Seller's Defect Warranty Liability in German Law and Its Enlightenment to China

Influencing Companies’ Green Governance Through the System of Legal Liability for Environmental Infractions in China and Brazil: Lighting the Way Toward BRICS Cooperation

Product Liability in a Global Context: the Hollow Victory of the European Model

Justice in Tort Law of Russia and China

Development Of Maritime Limitation Of Liability In China (1993-2011)

Liability for environmental damage and insurance coverage under German law

From domestic to global? Recent trends in environmental liability from a multilevel and comparative law perspective

The Question of the Applicable Law in Cross-Border Claims on Product Liability: Reflections from India

Tort Liability of Public Authorities in European Laws

Legal Mechanisms to Regulate Civil Liability for Actions of Artificial Intelligence in the Russian Federation and European Union Law

Breach of Contract: A Converging Concept and Its Future in Civil Law

The Tort Liability of CRAs in Europe and the Need for a Harmonized Proximity Requirement at the Union Level

Deterrence, insurability and compensation in environmental liability. Future developments in the European Union

Liability Rules for AI-Related Harm: Law and Economics Lessons for a European Approach

The Law Applicable to Tortious Liability: a Comparative Analysis of Article 4 of The Rome II Regulation and Private International Law in Ghana

Torts and intellectual property in Industry 4.0: a comparative study of Chinese and American jurisprudence

Parental Corporate Liability as Tort in the United Kingdom Part I: How the Past Informs the Challenge of Contemporary Regulation

A Study On The Liability Of Transnational Environmental Harm

A Study on the Informal Third-party Product Liability Governance Mechanisms

Civil Litigation Against Third-Country Defendants in the EU: Effective Access to Justice as a Rationale for European Harmonization of the Law of International Jurisdiction