Monoclonal antibodies to different epitopes on a cell-surface enzyme, human placental alkaline phosphatase, effect different patterns of labeling with protein A-colloidal gold.

R Jemmerson,M Agre
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/35.11.2443558
1987-11-01
Abstract:Two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to different epitopes on human placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP), both of the immunoglobulin G2a heavy-chain class and having similar affinities for PLAP, were compared for their ability to label the enzyme on the HeLa cell surface. In one type of experiment employing [125I]-labeled mAbs, the results demonstrated quantitative differences in binding of the mAbs to the cells. At saturating levels, the number of molecules of mAb E5 bound to the cells was almost eight times the number of mAb B10 molecules bound. In another type of experiment, mAbs were indirectly visualized on the cell surface using protein A tagged with colloidal gold particles in transmission electron microscopy. Only one of the antibodies (E5) displayed a clustered distribution of PLAP that previously had been observed with rabbit polyclonal antibodies and goat anti-rabbit IgG-labeled gold (J Histochem Cytochem 33:1227, 1985). The other antibody (B10) showed less frequent and more scattered labeling; three to four times more gold particles were visualized in each cluster on cells bound by mAb E5 compared to cells bound by B10. These results are consistent with the idea that not all epitopes on a membrane-bound antigen may be equally accessible for antibody binding. Even identical epitopes on different PLAP molecules are not equally hindered by other membrane components, since at least some of the PLAP molecules are labeled by the more sterically hindered mAb B10. Quantification of the number of gold particles employing the more abundantly bound mAb E5 provides an average estimate of seven to eight molecules of PLAP in each cluster. Because of inefficiencies in labeling, however, this value is probably lower than the real number.
cell biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?