Abstract:The building project development approval process is increasingly complex and fraught with conflict due to the rise of the sustainable urban development movement and inclusive decision making. Coupled with this, government decision-making decentralization has resulted in a fragmented and over-regulated compliance system. Problems arising from the process include wasted resources, excessive time delays, increased holding and litigation costs, inadequate planning coordination, high levels of advocacy costs and a divisive politicized approval process. In Australia, despite attempts by government and industry associations, numerous problems are still unresolved. Design managers increasingly assume a liaison role during the approval phase. There is a long tradition of planning theory literature which provides context for understanding the knowledge—power—participation relationship for this paper. This study investigated the policy, process and practice conflicts during the approval stage in achieving sustainable urban developments. Three regional local government areas within one state jurisdiction and observations from detailed structured focus group interviews involving 23 stakeholders, proposers and assessors were analysed to explore this conflictual environment. As a result of regulatory fragmentation and excessive consultation, various persuasion tactics have been developed by all stakeholders of which ‘reciprocity’ and ‘authority’ were identified as the most common. Two challenges for design managers were thus identified: first, the emergence of the role of a by default central informal arbitrator across conflicting planning instruments; and, second, as a navigator through a set of persuasion tactics. An inclusive knowledge-based design management framework for sustainable urban development is proposed considering Habermas' communicative planning theory, Foucaltian governance and discursive powers thesis and Cialdini's persuasion theory, as well as being grounded in the key empirical results from this study, using various types and sources of knowledge as an authoritative persuasion tactic.

Sydney Post-war Metropolitan Planning: The Rise and Fall of the Satellite Town as a Spatial Imaginary

The politics of urban renewal in Sydney’s residential apartment market

Less planning, more development? Housing and urban reform discourses in Australia

Suburban Futures, Density and Amenity: Soft Densification and Incremental Planning for Regeneration

Spatial Transformation of Metropolitan Cities

How workable is a 20-minute city in Australia? Re-examining the challenge of change in spatial labour and job relations

Impact of a Fragmented Regulatory Environment on Sustainable Urban Development Design Management

Prospects for a Megacity Region Transition in Australia: A Preliminary Examination of Transport and Communication Drivers

Planning, governance and rural futures in Australia and the USA: revisiting the case for rural regional planning

Healthy urban planning: an institutional policy analysis of strategic planning in Sydney, Australia

Farming the City Fringe: Dilemmas for Peri-Urban Planning

The expertise of participation: mass housing and urban planning in post-war France

City sizes and economic roles: Urban typologies within the Australian urban system

The Mechanism and Development Strategies of Town Spatial Expansion on Metropolitan Fringe: A Case Study of Liangzhu Town, Hangzhou City

On the challenges ahead of spatial scientometrics focusing on the city level

To what extent ‘an entirely new approach to how planning is done’? Tracing planning system reform in New South Wales

Hidden homes? Uncovering Sydney’s informal housing market

Coupling cellular automata and What If? models for residential expansion simulation: A case study of Southwest Sydney, Australia

FROM GLOBALIZING TAIPEI TO LEARNING AMSTERDAM: Referencing as a Politicizing Strategy for Urban Development in Taiwan

Changes in the Spatial Development of a Satellite Town under the Impact of a Metropolitan City—Evidence from Pruszcz Gdański (Poland)

Smart Urban Regeneration: Visions, Institutions and Mechanisms