Abstract:Three psychological refractory period (PRP) experiments were conducted to assess the effect of central arrival times at the bottleneck on task order scheduling. In Experiment 1, a visual first task (plus–minus symbol discrimination) was combined with an auditory second task (left–right tone judgement) in a standard PRP paradigm with constant task order. In Experiment 2, the order of the tasks varied unpredictably. In Experiment 3, visual–auditory dual-task trials were randomly mixed with single-task trials. To dissociate central arrival times from stimulus detection times, the perceptual stage of the visual task was extended using stimulus degradation. Most importantly, no evidence for a first-come, first-served principle at the central bottleneck was found with the employed paradigms. Instead, the results indicated that preparation (Experiment 1) and the detection times of the stimuli (Experiments 2 and 3) were the main determinants of central processing order in the present study. In the light of previous research, the results indicate that central processing order can be influenced by various factors. The interplay between these factors seems to depend highly on the conditions and requirements of the employed experimental paradigm.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to explore whether the central processing order is affected by the central arrival time in the Psychological Refractory Period (PRP) paradigm. Specifically, the researchers conducted three experiments to evaluate the impact of the central arrival time on the task - processing order when the central arrival time is inconsistent with the order of stimulus presentation. The main purpose of the paper is to examine whether the task - processing order follows the "first - come - first - served" principle under different versions of the PRP paradigm. ### Research Background The Psychological Refractory Period paradigm is often used to analyze cognitive processes in dual - task processing. In this paradigm, the time overlap of two choice reaction - time tasks is manipulated to evaluate the reaction time and response accuracy of the two tasks. The traditional central bottleneck model assumes that processes in certain information - processing chains form a bottleneck and can only process one task at a time. This bottleneck is mainly responsible for retrieving responses from stimuli and is located between the perceptual stage and the motor stage. ### Research Questions 1. **Central Arrival Time**: When the central arrival time is inconsistent with the order of stimulus presentation, will the central arrival time affect the central processing order? 2. **Preparation Effect**: Is the task - processing order affected by the expectation of the previous task order? 3. **Detection Time**: Is the task - processing order affected by the stimulus detection time? ### Experimental Design - **Experiment 1**: Use the standard PRP paradigm with a fixed task order. The visual task (plus - minus sign discrimination) is the first task, and the auditory task (left - right pitch judgment) is the second task. - **Experiment 2**: The task order is unpredictable. The order of the visual task and the auditory task changes randomly. - **Experiment 3**: Randomly mix single - task trials and dual - task trials. ### Method To separate the central arrival time and the stimulus detection time, the researchers extended the perceptual stage of the visual task through degradation processing. When the visual stimulus is degraded and the auditory stimulus appears after a short SOA, the auditory stimulus should be ready for central processing earlier than the visual stimulus. ### Key Issues The key issue in the study is whether the manipulation of the central arrival time will affect the central processing order, that is, whether the order of the two responses will change. To minimize the possible impact of specific instructions, participants were told to respond to each stimulus as quickly and accurately as possible, but there were no specific restrictions on the response order. ### Conclusion The research results show that in the paradigms used, there is no evidence to support the "first - come - first - served" principle at the central bottleneck. Instead, preparation (Experiment 1) and stimulus detection time (Experiment 2 and Experiment 3) are the main factors determining the central processing order. These results indicate that the central processing order can be affected by multiple factors, and the interaction between these factors is highly dependent on the conditions and requirements of the experimental paradigm adopted.

Determinants of Central Processing Order in Psychological Refractory Period Paradigms: Central Arrival Times, Detection Times, or Preparation?

Wu Yanwen1;You Xuqun2;Li Haixia1

Visual Dominance Effect Upon Passing the Central Bottleneck of Information Processing.

Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics

Parallel and serial task processing in the PRP paradigm: a drift-diffusion model approach

Dual-Tasking in the Near-Hand Space: Effects of Stimulus-Hand Proximity on Between-Task Shifts in the Psychological Refractory Period Paradigm

Perceptual Anticipation and Reaction Time

Fate of the Second Task in Dual-Task Interference is Associated with Sensory System Interactions with Default-Mode Network

The Parallel Process of Mental Rotation in Dual-task Situation

Preparatory attention: experiment and theory

Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition

Effect Anticipation Affects Perceptual, Cognitive, and Motor Phases of Response Preparation: Evidence from an Event-Related Potential (ERP) Study

The electrophysiology of sequential adjustments of dual‐task order coordination

Competition for the focus of attention in visual working memory: perceptual recency versus executive control

Does precrastination explain why some observers are suboptimal in a visual search task?

Perceptual processing demands influence voluntary task choice

[Effects of Task Probability on Context Processing: Spatiotemporal Analysis of Event-Related Potential].

Perceived Audio-Visual Simultaneity Is Recalibrated by the Visual Intensity of the Preceding Trial

The Mechanism of Repetition Priming Effect on Temporal Order Perception

Modeling Psychological Refractory Period (PRP) and Practice Effect on PRP with Queuing Networks and Reinforcement Learning Algorithms