Abstract:The Hebb effect refers to the improvement in immediate memory performance on a repeated list compared to unrepeated lists. That is, participants create a long-term memory representation over repetitions, on which they can draw in working memory tests. These long-term memory representations are likely formed by chunk acquisition: The whole list becomes integrated into a single unified representation. Previous research suggests that the formation of such chunks is rather inflexible and only occurs when at least the beginning of the list repeats across trials. However, recent work has shown that repetition learning strongly depends on participants recognizing the repeated information. Hence, successful chunk formation may depend on the recognizability of the repeated part of a list, and not on its position in the list. Across six experiments, we compared these two alternatives. We tested immediate serial recall of eight-letter lists, some of which partially repeated across trials. We used different partial-repetition structures, such as repeating only the first half of a list, or only every second item. We manipulated the salience of the repeating structure by spatially grouping and coloring the lists according to the repetition structure. We found that chunk formation is more flexible than previously assumed: Participants learned contiguous repeated sequences regardless of their position within the list, as long as they were able to recognize the repeated structure. Even when the repeated sequence occurred at varying positions over repetitions, learning was preserved when the repeated sequence was made salient by the spatial grouping. These findings suggest that chunk formation requires recognition of which items constitute a repeating group, and demonstrate a close link between grouping of information in working memory, and chunk formation in long-term memory.

ASSOCIATIVE GROUPING AND FREE RECALL

Clustering in free recall as a function of certain methodological variations.

Recall of categorized and unrelated lists with complete versus discrete presentation and fast versus moderate presentation rates

Age differences in free recall and clustering as a function of list length and trials

The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes

Developmental changes in free recall and serial learning of categorically structured lists

Effects of semantic list structure differences in free recall

With development, list recall includes more chunks, not just larger ones.

Grouping by Time and Pitch Facilitates Free but Not Cued Recall for Word Lists in Normally-Hearing Listeners

EFFECTS OF LIST-ITEM CUES UPON FREE RECALL OF CATEGORIZED WORD LISTS

Prediction of Organization in Free Recall from Reported Learning Strategy

Chunk limits and length limits in immediate recall: a reconciliation

Word length effect in free recall of randomly assembled word lists

Short-term Temporal Changes in Free Recall

Free Recall Shows Similar Reactivation Behavior as Recognition & Cued Recall

Organizational Strategies Partially Account for Race-related Differences in List Recall Performance

Improving associative memory in younger and older adults with unitization: evidence from meta-analysis and behavioral studies

Developmental Sensitivity to Temporal Grouping Effects in Short-term Memory

Dissociating early- and late-selection processes in recall: The mixed blessing of categorized study lists

Grouping in working memory guides chunk formation in long-term memory: Evidence from the Hebb effect

Memory for Related and Unrelated Words: Further Evidence on the Influence of Semantic Factors in Immediate Serial Recall