Comment on “Short-cut transport path for Asian dust directly to the Arctic: a case Study” by Huang, Z., J. Huang, T., Hayasaka, S. Wang, T. Zhou and H. Jin (2015) in Environ. Res. Lett.

Keyvan Ranjbar,Norm T. O'Neill,Yasmin Aboel-Fetouh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-652
2021-10-13
Abstract:Abstract. The suggestion of Huang et al. (2015) on the climatological-scale transport of Asian dust to the Arctic appears to be an important and worthwhile assertion. It is unfortunate that the authors undermined, to a certain degree, the quality of that assertion by a misinterpretation of the critical March 24, 2010 Arctic event (which was chosen by the authors to illustrate their generalized, climatological scale Arctic transport claim). They attempted to characterize that key event using AERONET/AEROCAN retrievals taken a day later and misinterpreted those largely cloud-dominated retrievals as being representative of Asian dust while apparently not recognizing that the coarse mode aerosol optical depth (AOD) retrievals on the previous day were actually coherent with their Arctic transport hypothesis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?