Abstract:Key PointsThe liver provides a useful generic model of inflammation and repair, showing the complex interplay between the epithelial, inflammatory, myofibroblast and extracellular matrix (ECM) components of the mammalian wound-healing response. In almost all situations, fibrosis is preceded by inflammation and elements of both the innate and adaptive immune systems are crucial in regulating the fibrotic process.Following liver injury, pro-inflammatory mediators that are generated by cellular damage and stimulated immune cells, as well as growth factors and cytokines (including platelet-derived growth factor, connective tissue growth factor, transforming growth factor-β and interleukin-13), activate mesenchymal precursor cells in tissues and induce their transdifferentiation into myofibroblasts. Myofibroblasts are master regulators of the fibrotic response as a result of their acquisition of scar-producing, proliferative, migratory, contractile, immunomodulatory and phagocytic properties.Recent studies have used bone marrow transplantation techniques in reporter mice to show that, regardless of the aetiology or the duration of the injury, liver myofibroblasts are almost exclusively derived from the activation of resident mesenchymal cells. Perpetuation of myofibroblast fibrogenic activity is mediated through several positive feedback loops, involving the autocrine and paracrine effects of cytokines and growth factors, and cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions. Myofibroblasts themselves function as innate immune cells.The balance of T helper 1 (TH1) cell-mediated and TH2 cell-mediated adaptive immune responses, the influence of unconventional T cell subsets and the equilibrium between different pro-inflammatory (that is, pro-fibrotic) and pro-resolution macrophage populations determine whether the outcome of tissue injury is homeostatic and self-limited or whether it results in pathogenic scarring.Liver fibrosis in rodents and humans is a dynamic, bidirectional process that has an inherent capacity for recovery and remodelling. The loss of myofibroblasts from the hepatic scar and a crucial switch in macrophage phenotype to a pro-resolution cell type are important events in the regression of liver fibrosis that facilitate remodelling of the ECM.A considerable number of tractable therapeutic targets have been identified in liver fibrosis, but clinical trials of anti-fibrotic therapies have so far been unsuccessful. Identification of the core pathways in fibrosis is likely to yield greater success in clinical translation.

Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Liver Fibrosis Regression

Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Liver Fibrosis Regression

Molecular and cellular mechanisms of liver fibrosis and its regression

Liver Fibrosis: From Pathogenesis to Novel Therapies

Liver Fibrosis Resolution: from Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Opportunities

From Basic Science towards Clinical Progress, Focusing on the Central Role of Hepatic Stellate Cells

Recent Advancements in Antifibrotic Therapies for Regression of Liver Fibrosis

Liver fibrosis and repair: immune regulation of wound healing in a solid organ

Liver fibrosis: Pathophysiology and clinical implications

[Research Advances in the Treatment of Hepatic Fibrosis].

Cellular and molecular mechanisms in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis: An update

Targeting Fibrosis: From Molecular Mechanisms to Advanced Therapies

Liver fibrosis and hepatic stellate cells: Etiology, pathological hallmarks and therapeutic targets

Cellular Mechanisms in Liver Fibrosis Regression

Liver Fibrosis and Altered Matrix Synthesis

Emerging Therapies for Liver Fibrosis

New Developments on the Treatment of Liver Fibrosis

Liver fibrosis: Pathophysiology, pathogenetic targets and clinical issues

Liver Fibrosis Leading to Cirrhosis: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Perspectives

The role and regulation of hepatic stellate cell apoptosis in reversal of liver fibrosis