Abstract:Openness and sharing of discovery lie at the heart of the scientific method. Yet historically, the data and reports upon which they are based have not been easily accessible and often require onerous efforts to obtain. From this was borne the open data movement, which has advanced research and transformed public health policy-making in countries that have embraced this change. Open health data refers to unrestricted, free-of-charge access to health data [1]. By making health data available to all without any limitations to its reuse, it leverages national transparency, accountability, participation, innovation, and research through a multitude of data sources in large volumes—as well as paving the way for the creation of novel citizen-centric services [1,2]. The ability to access and combine diverse health data enriches analytical capacity and evaluation that can inform national policy development and improve healthcare delivery [3,4]. Open health data is therefore a public resource and should be delivered purposefully and proactively, in line with user needs and its potential contribution to value creation [2]. However, the open data movement comes with the need to balance its benefits with the security and privacy challenges that come with it, such as the risk of re-identification [4]. The issue of selling medical data to commercial organizations such as pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, and other private companies has also stirred much controversy and raised concerns about ethicality, reproducibility, and generalizability [5]. Undeniably, challenges to the implementation of open health data remain, including the lack of awareness of its potential benefits, unsteady leadership and accountability, and weak legal and ethical oversight. Additionally, addressing the enormous gap in resources and knowledge on tools and techniques is acutely needed to make the technological shift to open and interoperable databases with unified protocols, frameworks, and terminology [3]. Despite the challenges in open health data, numerous countries and institutions have proven its feasibility with the proper legislation and implementation. By incorporating formal requirements in national open data strategies, laws, and regulations, the majority of Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member countries have successfully adopted and scaled up "open by default" and "government as platform" approaches to data [2]. This has resulted in stronger governance frameworks and an increase in data availability, paving the way for the publication and use of open government data in various sectors geared towards social, government, and business innovation, with potentially important implications for public sector integrity, sustainable development, and gender equality [2]. With the passage of its e-government law, Germany has catapulted its data accessibility in recent years to provide data in machine-readable formats, with metadata descriptions, free of charge, and with unrestricted access for reuse [2]. Upon adoption of its Open Data Charter, Canada also released a number of online databases, such as The Public Health InfoBase and PulseNet Canada, which offer easy-to-use tools for accessing public health data on chronic diseases, mental health conditions, and foodborne molecular surveillance, to name a few [3]. Additionally, the widely utilized, freely-accessible critical care MIMIC databases have provided scientific opportunities for academic and industrial research, quality improvement initiatives, and higher education coursework [6–8]. Conversely, there is a critical need for the United Nations and other global organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) to develop and espouse open health data as a global strategy as this movement consequently cascades to the regional and national levels.

Open data in digital strategies against COVID-19: the case of Belgium

Translating the COVID-19 epidemiological situation into policies and measures: the Belgian experience

Open government data for crisis management: Rapid information sharing and co-creation of services

Social inequalities and long-term health impact of COVID-19 in Belgium: protocol of the HELICON population data linkage

COVID-19 contact tracing in Belgium: main indicators and performance, January – September 2021

Evaluation study of the urban governance of the COVID-19 crisis in the city of Antwerp

Digital tools against COVID-19: Framing the ethical challenges and how to address them

The Importance of Open Data Policy to Tackle Pandemic in Latin America

Best practices for government agencies to publish data: lessons from COVID-19

Call to action for global and national actors for open health data

Positioning Digital Tracing Applications in the Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic in France

Data and Digital Solutions to Support Surveillance Strategies in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic

A structured open dataset of government interventions in response to COVID-19

Assessing the impact of forced and voluntary behavioral changes on economic-epidemiological co-dynamics: A comparative case study between Belgium and Sweden during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic

Psychological science and its societal mission during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic: The Motivation Barometer as an evidence‐informed policy instrument in Belgium

Municipal Pathways in Response to COVID-19: A Strategic Management Perspective on Local Public Administration Resilience

Using Big Data Tools to Analyze Digital Footprint in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Some Public Health Ethics Considerations

Open Data and Transparency: Opportunities and Challenges in the Swiss Context

Mobilisation and analyses of publicly available SARS-CoV-2 data for pandemic responses

Empowering Open Data Sharing for Social Good: A Privacy-Aware Approach

Open Government Data (OGD) sites and the sharing of country-specific real-time pandemic information: An investigation into COVID-19 datasets available on worldwide OGDs