Rolling Out the Red (and Green) Carpet: Supporting Driver Decision Making in Automation-to-Manual Transitions
Alexander Eriksson,Sebastiaan M. Petermeijer,Markus Zimmermann,Joost C. F. de Winter,Klaus J. Bengler,Neville A. Stanton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/thms.2018.2883862
2019-02-01
Abstract:This paper assessed four types of humanmachine interfaces (HMIs), classified according to the stages of automation proposed by Parasuraman et al. [A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. A, Syst. Humans, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 286297, May 2000]. We hypothesized that drivers would implement decisions (lane changing or braking) faster and more correctly when receiving support at a higher automation stage during transitions from conditionally automated driving to manual driving. In total, 25 participants with a mean age of 25.7years (range 1936 years) drove four trials in a driving simulator, experiencing four HMIs having the following different stages of automation: baseline (information acquisitionlow), sphere (information acquisitionhigh), carpet (information analysis), and arrow (decision selection), presented as visual overlays on the surroundings. The HMIs provided information during two scenarios, namely a lane change and a braking scenario. Results showed that the HMIs did not significantly affect the drivers initial reaction to the take-over request. Improvements were found, however, in the decision-making process: When drivers experienced the carpet or arrow interface, an improvement in correct decisions (i.e., to brake or change lane) occurred. It is concluded that visual HMIs can assist drivers in making a correct braking or lane change maneuver in a take-over scenario. Future research could be directed toward misuse, disuse, errors of omission, and errors of commission.
computer science, cybernetics, artificial intelligence