Underwater radiated noise measurements of a noise‐reduced research vessel: Comparison between a U.S. Navy noise range and a simple hydrophone mooring.

Alex De Robertis,Christopher D. Wilson,Peter H. Dahl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3588099
2011-04-01
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Abstract:[A feasibility study was undertaken to characterize underwater radiated noise for a new class of noise-reduced fisheries research vessels using a field-deployable hydrophone system. Recent studies have demonstrated that vessel-radiated noise can impact the behavior of fish, and that periodic monitoring of survey-vessel radiated noise is desirable to characterize potential biases in fish abundance estimates. Vessel radiated noise is traditionally measured at naval ranges, but lower-cost options are desirable. Beam aspect measurements of a noise-reduced vessel made at a U.S. Navy noise range are compared to those made using an experimental mooring equipped with commercially available instrumentation. Hydrophone depths and distance-to-the-vessel were comparable for the mooring and those used at the Southeast Alaska Acoustic Measurement Facility (SEAFAC). SEAFAC and mooring measurements were taken within a day of one another. Data processing was consistent with the recent American national standard for measurement of underwater sound from ships (ANSI/ASA S12.64-2009/Part 1). The measurements from the experimental mooring were precise and comparable to those made at SEAFAC. This suggests that reliable measurements suitable for monitoring the underwater radiated noise of vessels with low source levels can be made in the field.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?