Abstract:The space satellite mission will measure the large-scale clustering of galaxies at an unprecedented precision, providing a unique probe of modifications to the Lambda CDM model. We investigated the approximations needed to efficiently predict the large-scale clustering of matter and dark matter halos in the context of modified gravity and exotic dark energy scenarios. We examined the normal branch of the Dvali--Gabadadze--Porrati model, the Hu--Sawicki $f(R)$ model, a slowly evolving dark energy model, an interacting dark energy model, and massive neutrinos. For each, we tested approximations for the perturbative kernel calculations, including the omission of screening terms and the use of perturbative kernels based on the Einstein--de Sitter universe; we explored different infrared-resummation schemes, tracer bias models and a linear treatment of massive neutrinos; we investigated various approaches for dealing with redshift-space distortions and modelling the mildly nonlinear scales, namely the Taruya--Nishimishi--Saito prescription and the effective field theory of large-scale structure. This work provides a first validation of the various codes being considered by for the spectroscopic clustering probe in beyond-Lambda CDM scenarios. We calculated and compared the $ statistic to assess the different modelling choices. This was done by fitting the spectroscopic clustering predictions to measurements from numerical simulations and perturbation theory-based mock data. We compared the behaviour of this statistic in the beyond-Lambda CDM cases, as a function of the maximum scale included in the fit, to the baseline Lambda CDM case. We find that the Einstein--de Sitter approximation without screening is surprisingly accurate for the modified gravity cases when comparing to the halo clustering monopole and quadrupole obtained from simulations and mock data. Further, we find the same goodness-of-fit for both cases -- the one including and the one omitting non-standard physics in the predictions. Our results suggest that the inclusion of multiple redshift bins, higher-order multipoles, higher-order clustering statistics (such as the bispectrum), and photometric probes such as weak lensing, will be essential to extract information on massive neutrinos, modified gravity and dark energy. Additionally, we show that the three codes used in our analysis, namely PBJ Pybird and MG-Copter exhibit sub-percent agreement for $k Mpc $ across all the models. This consistency underscores their value as reliable tools.

The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS). Part II: Approximation schemes

Implementation of two-field inflation for cosmic linear anisotropy solving system

21cmFirstCLASS I. Cosmological tool for $Λ$CDM and beyond

21cmFirstCLASS II. Early linear fluctuations of the 21cm signal

New tool for 21-cm cosmology. II. Investigating the effect of early linear fluctuations

Optimising Boltzmann codes for the Planck era

Understanding CMB physics through the exploration of exotic cosmological models: a classroom study using CLASS

New tool for 21-cm cosmology. I. Probing and beyond

GW_CLASS: Cosmological Gravitational Wave Background in the Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System

CLASS Data Pipeline and Maps for 40 GHz Observations through 2022

II: Bayesian Methods for Cosmological Parameter Estimation from Cosmic Microwave Background Measurements

An accurate fluid approximation for massive neutrinos in cosmology

Euclid preparation. XLIV. Modelling spectroscopic clustering on mildly nonlinear scales in beyond-LCDM models

On the cosmological evolution of Scalar Field Dark Matter in the $\texttt{CLASS}$ code: accuracy and precision of numerical solutions

CDM-Variant Cosmological Models - I: Simulations and Preliminary Comparisons

Non-fluid like Boltzmann code architecture for early times f(T) cosmologies

BeyondPlanck IV. On end-to-end simulations in CMB analysis -- Bayesian versus frequentist statistics

Improved simulation of non-Gaussian temperature and polarization CMB maps

Euclid preparation. Simulations and nonlinearities beyond $Λ$CDM. 1. Numerical methods and validation

Predicting Cosmological Observables with PyCosmo