Comparison of different chiral selectors for the enantiomeric determination of amphetamine‐type substances in human urine by solid‐phase extraction followed by capillary electrophoresis‐tandem mass spectrometry

Sergi Pascual‐Caro,Francesc Borrull,Carme Aguilar,Marta Calull
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.202100231
2021-10-24
Electrophoresis
Abstract:The present study develops a method for the enantioseparation of a group of amphetamines and their metabolites in urine by capillary electrophoresis coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (CE-MS/MS). Amphetamines present a chiral centre and thus two enantiomers, which is important from a toxicological point of view because they may have different pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties. It is therefore essential to find suitable methods to distinguish both enantiomers. Today the use of CE is becoming more important in this field since, with the simple addition of a chiral selector to the background electrolyte, the enantioseparation can easily be achieved. However, when CE is coupled to MS, the use of volatile chiral selectors and compatible background electrolytes or other strategies such as the counter-current migration approach are required to avoid contamination of the ion source from non-volatile species. In the present study we use the latter strategy to evaluate six different chiral selectors using CE-MS/MS. As a sample pre-treatment, two cationic-exchange sorbents – Oasis WCX and Oasis MCX – are compared for the urine pre-treatment. Using this method, it was possible to achieve the complete chiral separation of the amphetamines under study with detection limits ranging between 0.8 and 1.5 ng/mL and method quantification limits between 2.0 and 8.0 ng/mL. Matrix-matched calibration curves up to 150 ng/mL were used to cover the usual concentration ranges at which amphetamines have generally been found in toxicological and forensic analyses.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
biochemical research methods,chemistry, analytical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?