Abstract:Faking in self-report personality questionnaires describes a deliberate response distortion aimed at presenting oneself in an overly favorable manner. Unless the influence of faking on item responses is taken into account, faking can harm multiple psychometric properties of a test. In the present article, we account for faking using an extension of the multidimensional nominal response model (MNRM), which is an item response theory (IRT) model that offers a flexible framework for modeling different kinds of response biases. Particularly, we investigated under which circumstances the MNRM can adequately adjust substantive trait scores and latent correlations for the influence of faking and examined the role of variation in the way item content is related to social desirability (i.e., item desirability characteristics) in facilitating the modeling of faking and counteracting its detrimental effects. Using a simulation, we found that the inclusion of a faking dimension in the model can overall improve the recovery of substantive trait person parameters and latent correlations between substantive traits, especially when the impact of faking in the data is high. Item desirability characteristics moderated the effect of modeling faking and were themselves associated with different levels of parameter recovery. In an empirical demonstration with N = 1070 test-takers, we also showed that the faking modeling approach in combination with different item desirability characteristics can prove successful in empirical questionnaire data. We end the article with a discussion of implications for psychological assessment.

Effects of Faking Instructions on the Eysenck Personality Inventory

Effects of Sophistication and Faking Sets on the Eysenck Personality Inventory

Applying Implicit Propositional Measures to Detect Faking in Personality-Related Scales: Reliability, Discriminating Power, and Classification Accuracy

A Theoretical Model of Psychometric Effects of Faking on Assessment Procedures: Empirical findings and implications for personality at work

Can Forced-Choice Response Format Reduce Faking of Socially Aversive Personality Traits?

Detecting Feigning in Adolescents on the Personality Assessment Inventory—Adolescent Form

Testing the Efficacy of A New Procedure for Reducing Faking on Personality Tests Within Selection Contexts

Effects of Applicant Faking on Forced-Choice and Likert Scores

The Kirton Adaption Innovation Inventory, Faking, and Social Desirability: A Replication and Extension

Whoever you want me to be: Personality and incentives

Retesting after initial failure, coaching rumors, and warnings against faking in online personality measures for selection.

The Good, the Bad, and the Clever: Faking Ability as a Socio-Emotional Ability?

Using the multidimensional nominal response model to model faking in questionnaire data: The importance of item desirability characteristics

Use of subtle and obvious scales to detect faking on the MCMI-II

Developing Pairwise Preference-Based Personality Test and Experimental Investigation of Its Resistance to Faking Effect by Item Response Model

I lie because I am good at: psychopathic traits do not influence the effects of fabrication on memory

Why One Fakes a Head Injury Affects How One Fakes a Head Injury

Comparing Personality Test Formats and Warnings: Effects on criterion-related validity and test-taker reactions

Personality Differences between Prisoners and Controls

On the effect of warnings on criterion-related validity of personality scores: Testing an indirect moderation model

The Eysenck Personality Inventory: Some Considerations