Abstract:Introduction: Some events are remembered as more central to a person's identity than others. However, it is not entirely clear what characterizes these autobiographical memories central to one's identity. In this study, we examined the effects of various characteristics on centrality to identity of positive and negative memories. Characteristics such as emotionality, vividness, and how frequently a memory is retrieved and shared with others as well as ruminative and reflective self-foci were studied. Methods: The sample included 356 participants (18-92 years of age). First, participants responded to demographic questions and individual difference questionnaires. Next, they recalled memories in response to 12 emotional cue words. The cue words were balanced for emotional valence (i.e., six positive and six negative) and presented in a random order. After retrieving all memories, participants rated them regarding centrality, using the short seven-item Centrality of Event Scale and other memory characteristics, on a seven-point Likert scale. Multivariate multilevel regression was used for data analyzes, to consider multiple characteristics at the same time and account for data dependency within individual. Results: The results showed that emotionality, vividness, and frequency of memory retrieval contributed to higher centrality of memories, and employing a reflective self-focus resulted in rating memories as more central. In specific cases, these characteristics were associated differently with centrality of positive and negative memories. Discussion: Central memories can be perceived as markers in a person's life story. The findings of this study suggest that these marker events are also highly available in a person's memory system, by being actively emotional, visually rich, and frequently retrieved. Moreover, not only memory characteristics but also individual's features are important to fully understand the autobiographical memory centrality.

Remembering the self in cultural contexts: A cultural dynamic theory of autobiographical memory

Remembering the good and bad and the self and others in a culturally modulated self-memory system

Why I remember that: The influence of contextual factors on beliefs about everyday memory

Culturally Motivated Remembering: The Moderating Role of Culture for the Relation of Episodic Memory to Well-Being

Does the Self Drive Mental Time Travel?

Cultural differences in earliest memory reports by European and Chinese American university students born in the United States

Constructing narrative, emotion, and self in parent–child conversations about the past

Culture, Psychological Proximity to the Past and Future, and Self‐continuity

Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model

Knowledge of Memory Functions in European and Asian American Adults and Children: the Relation to Autobiographical Memory.

Materialised Identities: Cultural Identity, Collective Memory, and Artifacts

Characteristics of positive and negative autobiographical memories central to identity: emotionality, vividness, rehearsal, rumination, and reflection

Influence of acculturation and cultural values on the self-reference effect

Use of self-referencing memory strategies change over time with acculturation

Cultural Differences In The Self: From Philosophy To Psychology And Neuroscience

Multicultural identity integration and well-being: a qualitative exploration of variations in narrative coherence and multicultural identification

Externalising the Autobiographical Self: Sharing Personal Memories Online Facilitated Memory Retention

Vicarious memory promotes successful adaptation and enriches the self.

Accuracy and reconstruction in autobiographical memory: (Re)consolidating neuroscience and sociocultural developmental approaches

Nostalgia and Online Autobiography: Implications for Global Self-Continuity and Psychological Well-Being

Travelling Backwards and Forwards in Time: Culture and Gender in the Episodic Specificity of Past and Future Events