Abstract:Association of birth outcome and model of care. Background Perinatal mental health (PMH) conditions are associated with adverse outcomes such as maternal suicide, preterm birth and longer‐term childhood sequelae. Midwifery continuity of care (one midwife or a small group of midwives) has demonstrated benefits for women and newborns, including a reduction in preterm birth and improvements in maternal anxiety/worry and depression. Aim To determine if midwifery care provided through a Midwifery Group Caseload Practice model is associated with improved perinatal outcomes for women who have anxiety and depression and/or other perinatal mental health conditions. An EPDS ≥ 13, and/or answered the thought of harming myself has occurred to me and/or women who self‐reported a history compared to standard models of care (mixed midwife/obstetric fragmented care). Methods A retrospective cohort study using data routinely collected via an electronic database between 1 January 2018 31st of January 2021. The population were women with current/history of PMH, who received Midwifery Caseload Group Practice (MCP), or standard care (SC). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics for maternal characteristics and logistic regression for birth outcomes. One‐to‐one matching of the MCP group with the SC group was based on propensity scores. Results 7,359 births were included MCP 12% and SC 88%. Anxiety was the most common PMH with the same proportion affected in MCP and SC. Adjusted odds of preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes were lower in the MCP group than the SC group (aOR (95%CI): 0.77 (0.55, 1.08) and 0.81 (0.68, 0.97), respectively) and higher for vaginal birth and full breastfeeding (aOR (95% CI): 1.87 (1.60, 2.18) and 2.06 (1.61, 2.63), respectively). In the matched sample the estimate of a relationship between MCP and preterm birth (aOR (95% CI): 0.88 (0.56, 1.42), adverse perinatal outcomes (aOR (95% CI): 0.83 (0.67, 1.05)) and breastfeeding at discharge (aOR (95% CI): 1.82 (1.30, 2.51)), stronger for vaginal birth (aOR (95% CI): 2.22 (1.77, 2.71)). Conclusion This study supports positive associations between MCP and breastfeeding and vaginal birth. MCP was also associated with lower risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, though in the matched sample with a smaller sample size, the confidence interval included 1. The direction of the association MCP and preterm birth was negative (protective). However, in the matched sample analysis, the confidence interval was wide, and the finding was also consistent with no benefit from MCP. Randomised controlled trials are required to answer questions around preterm birth and adverse perinatal outcomes and further research is being planned.

Midwives’ experiences of asking the Whooley questions to assess current mental health: a qualitative interpretive study

Accuracy of the Whooley questions and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in identifying depression and other mental disorders in early pregnancy

Midwives' perspectives on perinatal mental health: A qualitative exploratory study in a maternity setting in Karachi, Pakistan

Midwives' perspectives and perceptions in relation to perinatal psychotic-like experiences: a qualitative study

A systematic review of midwives' training needs in perinatal mental health and related interventions

A seesaw of equilibrium, midwives' experiences of infection prevention and control guideline adherence: A qualitative descriptive study

Perinatal healthcare for women at risk of childrens social care involvement: a qualitative survey of professionals in England

Women's perceptions of midwifery care: a longitudinal study to shape curriculum development

Experiences and expectations of women from ethnic minority background on perinatal mental health

Midwives' and registered nurses' role and scope of practice in acute early pregnancy care settings in Australia: A qualitative descriptive study

Inequalities in the identification and management of common mental disorders in the perinatal period: An equity focused re-analysis of a systematic review

Women's experiences of intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring in labour: A qualitative study

Women's engagement with community perinatal mental health services: a realist evaluation

A global overview of midwives' working conditions: A rapid review of literature on positive practice environment

Midwives' experiences of discussing health behaviour change within routine maternity care: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis

“Midwifery Abdication”:A Finding From an Interpretive Study

Midwifery continuity of care for women with perinatal mental health conditions: A cohort study from Australia

The key components of a successful model of midwifery-led continuity of carer, without continuity at birth: findings from a qualitative implementation evaluation

Healthcare professionals' views on the accessibility and acceptability of perinatal mental health services for South Asian and Black women: a qualitative study

Encourages and guides, or diagnoses and monitors: Woman centred-ness in the discourse of professional midwifery bodies

Meeting the health and social needs of pregnant asylum seekers: midwifery students' perspectives. Part 2: Dominant discourses and approaches to care