Protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting chronic low back pain rehabilitation adherence: analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Patrick J Owen,Luana C Main,Clint T Miller,Jon J Ford,Andrew J Hahne,Daniel L Belavy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052644
IF: 3.006
2022-02-01
BMJ Open
Abstract:Objective To explore a protection motivation theory screening tool for predicting rehabilitation adherence. Design Analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Setting An exercise physiology and physiotherapist clinic. Participants Patients with chronic low back pain (n=40). Interventions General strength and conditioning (GSC) compared with motor control and manual therapy. Primary and secondary outcome measures: predicting patient adherence to supervised sessions and dropout using the Sports Injury Rehabilitation Beliefs Scale, seven-item barriers checklist and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule and Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale. Results Average attendance was 77% (motor control and manual therapy) and 60% (GSC) with eight dropouts. No Sports Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale values other than 5 across all three components were recorded. Treatment efficacy (p=0.019), self-efficacy (p=0.001), rehabilitation value (p=0.028) and injury severity (p=0.002) positively correlated with susceptibility (the extent of vulnerability to having health problems from not taking action). Rehabilitation value positively correlated with self-efficacy (p=0.005). Injury severity positively correlated with rehabilitation value (p=0.011). The final model for number of cancellations included rehabilitation value only and accounted for approximately 12% of variance (p=0.033). Conclusions Perceived value of rehabilitation should be considered by clinicians in the rehabilitation setting to improve treatment adherence in patients with chronic low back pain. Trial registration number ACTRN12615001270505.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?