Are There Differences Between Online and In-Person Team-Based Learning Classes? Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory and Learners’ Characteristics

Irene Cheng Jie Lee,Peiyan Wong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1298958/v1

2022-02-03

Abstract:Abstract Background: The rapid transition to online delivery of medical curriculum has facilitated the continuation of medical education during COVID-19 pandemic. Whilst active learning approaches, including Team-Based Learning (TBL), are generally more supportive of the learner’s needs during such transition, it remains elusive how the different learning environments can affect a learner’s motivation, engagement and perceived learning over a prolonged period. We leveraged on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and key learners’ characteristics to explore student’s engagement and perceived learning in two TBL learning environments, online and in-person, over an extended period.Methods: This is a mixed method study with 53 preclinical medical students completed the same questionnaire twice for each learning environment, online TBL and in-person TBL, over an eight-month period. Quantitative data were collected on learners’ characteristics (such as resilience, curiosity, growth mindset, use of cognitive strategies and self-regulation), basic psychological needs satisfaction (autonomy, competence and relatedness), motivation (intrinsic, identified, external and amotivation), student’s engagement and perceived learning. The final questionnaire also explored participants’ perception on which learning environment better supported their learning. Results: We found that autonomy support, perceived competence and needs satisfaction, and perceived learning were higher in-person than online. We also showed that increases in autonomy support and intrinsic motivation positively predicted engagement, which in turn predicted enhanced perceived learning. Additionally, a majority of learners felt that in-person TBL was better for learning, as the concepts of learning space and the community of practice were mediated by being in-person. Conclusions: TBL, being an active instructional method, can maintain students’ engagement because it supports many aspects of SDT constructs perceived learning. However, online TBL is unable to fully support the students’ needs and perceived learning. Hence, we strongly advocate for any in-person opportunities to be included in a course and for instructors to adopt strategies that support learners’ ability to stay regulated and intrinsically motivated, as they are crucial predictors of engagement in any learning environment.