Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke

Joshua Sarfaty Siegel,Lenny E. Ramsey,Abraham Z. Snyder,Nicholas V. Metcalf,Ravi V. Chacko,Kilian Weinberger,Antonello Baldassarre,Carl D. Hacker,Gordon L. Shulman,Maurizio Corbetta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1521083113
IF: 11.1
2016-07-11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Significance Since the early days of neuroscience, the relative merit of structural vs. functional network accounts in explaining neurological deficits has been intensely debated. Using a large stroke cohort and a machine-learning approach, we show that visual memory and verbal memory deficits are better predicted by functional connectivity than by lesion location, and visual and motor deficits are better predicted by lesion location than functional connectivity. In addition, we show that disruption to a subset of cortical areas predicts general cognitive deficit (spanning multiple behavior domains). These results shed light on the complementary value of structural vs. functional accounts of stroke, and provide a physiological mechanism for general multidomain deficits seen after stroke.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?