Abstract:Background: Student voice agendas have been slow to permeate higher educational institutions. Curricula in universities, like those in primary and secondary education, are still usually made for students by teachers who, while they may have the best interests of the students in mind, rarely if ever engage students in curriculum decision-making. The need for more equitable, dialogic and democratic engagement by students is particularly relevant in the context of teacher education. It has been argued that pre-service teachers should experience democratic practices during their teacher education experiences in order to have the confidence, knowledge and skills to support democratic opportunities in schools. Purpose: Through the participatory action research project described in this paper we sought to position pre-service teachers as pedagogical consultants who would design feedback strategies, gather feedback with faculty and co-construct physical education teacher education (PETE) curricula. We saw this process as a democratic possibility that might create opportunities for pre-service teachers to critique and transform their own educational experiences. In this paper we detail the process we used to support dialogue about teaching and learning between students and faculty members and draw on the perspectives of the students, pedagogical consultant, lecturer and teaching and learning advocate involved in this project. Participants and setting: The project was undertaken with one cohort (77) of pre-service teachers during the final year of a four-year undergraduate PETE programme in an Irish university and focuses on the democratization of one PETE course. Data collection: Data were generated with and by the pre-service teachers, the pedagogical consultant, the lecturer and the regional teaching and learning advocate. The primary data collection methods were interviews and observation. Data analysis: The data were reviewed repeatedly looking for patterns, themes, regularities, paradoxes, variations, nuances in meaning and constraints [Rubin and Rubin 1995. Qualitative Interviewing. The art of Hearing Data. London: Sage]. The authors coded all data sets independently using constant comparison [Glaser 1965. “The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis.” Social Problems 12 (4): 436–445] and then shared their processes and subsequent codes. Our analysis engages Greene’s [1988. The Dialectic of Freedom. New York: Teachers College Press] dialectical theory, to explore how naming and holding the tensions involved in this research and pedagogical enterprise was not stultifying but generative. Findings: Three key dialectics were constructed from the data: student–teacher, critical reflection–learning and responsibility–accountability. We speak to each of these themes from the perspectives of the students, the pedagogical consultant and the lecturer who participated in this project. Discussion and conclusion: Our discussion turns to the challenges and benefits associated with the pursuit and realization of democratic possibilities in PETE.

Teacher empowerment through engagement in a learning community in Ireland: working across disadvantaged schools

Student voice as risky praxis: democratising physical education teacher education

Making some noise: voices of teacher educators in physical education curriculum development

Teaching about sustainability through inquiry-based science in Irish primary classrooms: the impact of a professional development programme on teacher self-efficacy, competence and pedagogy

Effective Professional Development for Physical Education Teachers: The Role of Informal, Collaborative Learning

Using meaningful experiences as a vision for physical education teaching and teacher education practice

'It's a challenge': Post primary physical education teachers' experiences of and perspectives on inclusive practice with students with disabilities

Opening up Neat New Things: Exploring Understandings and Experiences of Social and Emotional Learning and Meaningful Physical Education Utilizing Democratic and Reflective Pedagogies

“No One Works in Isolation Here”: The Socialization of Physical Education Teachers Into a Professional Learning Community

Physical Education Teachers’ Experiences of Nurturing a Community of Practice Online

Extended School Placement in Initial Teacher Education: Factors Impacting Professional Learning, Agency and Sense of Belonging

Listening to the voices of teachers: primary physical education in Ireland

Transferring primary generalists’ positive classroom pedagogy to the physical education setting: a collaborative PE-CPD process

“You’re Not Going to Get It Right Every Time”: Teachers’ Perspectives on Giving Voice to Students in Physical Education

A critical ethnography of teacher development and change in a collaborative group setting to improve practice

Mobilising new understandings: an actor-network analysis of learning and change in a self-directed professional development community

Supporting the enactment of inclusive pedagogy in a primary school

Partnership in Education, through Whole SchoolDevelopment with Parent and Community Involvement:A Study of a National Initiativeto Combat Educational Disadvantage -the Home, School, Community Liaison Scheme (2 Vols.)

Teacher professional leadership in support of teacher professional development

Professional learning and the individual education plan process: implications for teacher educators

Stepping Back, Stepping Up, and Stepping Forward: Exploring One Teacher’s Evolving Approach to Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in High School Physical Education