Abstract:Purpose – This study aims to investigate quality of feedback as offered by supervisor-assessors with varying levels of assessor expertise following assessment of performance in residency training in a health care setting. It furthermore investigates if and how different levels of assessor expertise influence feedback characteristics. Design/methodology/approach – Experienced ( n =18) and non-experienced ( n =16) supervisor-assessors with different levels of assessor expertise in general practice (GP) watched two videotapes, each presenting a trainee in a “real-life” patient encounter. After watching each videotape, participants documented performance ratings, wrote down narrative feedback comments and verbalized their feedback. Deductive content analysis of feedback protocols was used to explore quality of feedback. Between-group differences were assessed using qualitative-based quantitative analysis of feedback data. Findings – Overall, specificity and usefulness of both written and verbal feedback was limited. Differences in assessor expertise did not seem to affect feedback quality. Research limitations/implications – Results of the study are limited to a specific setting (GP) and assessment context. Further study in other settings and larger sample sizes may contribute to better understanding of the relation between assessor characteristics and feedback quality. Practical implications – Findings suggest that even with supervisor-assessors with varying levels of assessor expertise who are trained in performance assessment and the provision of performance feedback, high-quality feedback is not self-evident; coaching “on the job” of feedback providers and continuous evaluation of feedback processes in performance management systems is crucial. Instruments should facilitate provision of meaningful feedback in writing. Originality/value – The paper investigates quality of feedback immediately following assessment of performance, and links feedback quality to assessor expertise. Findings can contribute to improvement of performance management systems and assessments for developmental purposes.

Fostering oral presentation performance: does the quality of feedback differ when provided by the teacher, peers or peers guided by tutor?

Oral presentations in higher education: a comparison of the impact of peer and teacher feedback

Orchestrating Teacher, Peer, and Self-Feedback to Enhance Learners' Cognitive, Behavioral, and Emotional Engagement and Public Speaking Competence

Online peer feedback on video presentations: type of feedback and improvement of presentation skills

Peer-to-peer dialogue about teachers’ written feedback enhances students’ understanding on how to improve writing skills

Supporting Peer Feedback on Learning Strategies: Effects on Self-Efficacy and Feedback Quality

Holistic feedback approach with video and peer discussion under teacher supervision

Teacher feedback to student oral presentations in EFL classrooms: a case study

Peer Assessment of Student Presentations: Key Takeaways and Lessons Learned

Quality of feedback following performance assessments: does assessor expertise matter?

Teachers’ Practice and Perceptions of Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment of Presentation Skills

Developing Students’ English Oral Presentation Skills: Do Self-Confidence, Teacher Feedback, and English Proficiency Matter?

Exploring Student Perceptions of Oral Presentation Assessments in Higher Education

The impact of Danmaku-based and synchronous peer feedback on L2 oral performance: A mixed-method investigation

Fostering A Teaching And Learning Opportunity: Toward Equity In Student Feedback Of Teaching

Teachers' Questions and Responses during Teacher-Student Feedback Dialogues

Exploring peer feedback processes and peer feedback meta-dialogues with learners of academic and business English

Midterm peer feedback in problem-based learning groups: the effect on individual contributions and achievement

‘Only true friends could be cruelly honest’: cognitive scaffolding and social-affective support in teacher feedback literacy

Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs

Factors influencing students’ peer feedback uptake: instructional design matters