Abstract:This paper extends the theory of"bureaucratic&economic markets"and reinterprets the unique growth mechanism of the Chinese economy and the intriguing interaction between government and market.In China we observe an interesting"mutual embededness"of bureaucratic markets for local officials and economic markets for firms across jurisdictions:local leaders compete in bureaucratic markets where their promotion is closely linked with economic performance of firms in their jurisdictions,and in the meantime,firms compete in economic markets and receive critical support for their respective jurisdictional governments.The performance-based bureaucratic competition motivates local leaders to help local firms grow and win the economic competition,and the interregional mobility of physical and human capital limits the tendency of local leaders to predate or grab local firms.The economic performance of firms in market competition provides feedback and is an ultimate test of the effectiveness of government-business cooperation and local industrial policies.The extended theory of"bureaucratic&economic markets"contributes to the existing literature by highlighting three critical preconditions for effective government-market cooperation:providing political incentives to ensure bureaucrats"do things in the right way",external market constraints to"prevent bureaucrats from doing evil",and necessary information feedback to guide bureaucrats to"do the right thing".For any country or region,its ability to satisfy these three conditions becomes critical for fostering an effective interaction between government and market and sustaining economic growth. In the past decades China has shaped a growth model based on the interplay of"bureaucratic & economic markets"which generally satisfied the three preconditions and laid the institutional foundation for China's economic miracle. This dual-markets model has resulted in friendly handshaking between political and private entrepreneurs, productive cooperation between political and economic elites,and a remarkable combination of China' s time-honored heritage of strong bureaucracy with the western tradition of market economy. The dual-markets model also has its limitations,especially in the sphere of provision of public services,which exactly explains various"government failures"associated with China's high economic growth in the past 40 years.

Are China and the United States in a Competitive Zero-Sum Economic Game?

China's economic and trade development: Imbalance to equilibrium

A Model of China's State Capitalism

The Chinese economy at the crossroads and the uncertain future of the “China Model”

Profit-Making State Firms and China’s Development Experience

When Can Chinese Competitors Catch Up? Market and Capability Ladders and Their Implications for Multinationals

China's Trade Relations with the United States in Perspective

State Capitalism Vs. Private Enterprise

Not your grandparents’ Cold War: Why America should emphasize economic rather than military strategies in its rivalry with China

"Bureaucratic & Economic Markets"and China's Growth Story

Anti-Comparative Advantage: A Puzzle in U.S.-China Bilateral Trade

From Economic Cooperation to Strategic Competition: Understanding the US-China Trade Disputes through the Transformed Relations

Understanding china's economic performance

A Dynamic China Model: the Co-Evolution of Economics and Politics in China

A Study on the International Competitiveness of High-tech Industries in China and the U.S.A.

The China Model View is Factually False

From Partnership to Rivalry: China and the USA in the Early Twenty-First Century

15. China and the United States in the Next Decade

Defining China–US Strategic Competition: Partisan Realignment and the Domestic Political Logic of Change in American Strategy Toward China, 2009–2020

State Capitalism and the Chinese Economic Miracle

Getting China’s Political Economy Right: State, Business, and Authoritarian Capitalism