Abstract:In spite of their lower socioeconomic position in comparison to urban citizens, migrant workers usually report higher subjective well-being.Two interpretations address this inconsistency between objective socioeconomic status and subjective well-being judgement: homogeneous reference group hypothesis (HRG) and the prospect of upward mobility hypothesis (PUM).These two theories imply that migrant workers may choose different reference groups when engaging in social comparison.On one hand, HRG suggests that migrant workers may compare their income with that of other farmers in their origins, therefore their lower income status relative to urban workers won't hurt their evaluation of well-being.On the other hand, PUM suggests urban workers are migrant workers' reference group, acting as a signal of their income status in the future;thus the positive effect from expectation of upward mobility would overwhelm the negative influence of current lower income status.Based on large-scale nationally representative survey data, we test the above hypotheses by constructing multiple reference groups of migrant workers (i.e.farmers, migrant workers and urban workers).Our findings support the homogeneous reference group hypothesis: holding one's own income constant, the more other farmers in same province earn, the less satisfied migrant workers are, indicating migrant workers' higher income status relative to other farmers has a significant effect on their subjective well-being.Furthermore, the mysterious subjective well-being premium of migrant workers over urban citizens shrinks dramatically, even to negative, after including the average income of their rural peers.Nevertheless, the prospect of upward mobility hypothesis is not supported: the average income of other urban workers shows no significant influence, and it may not result from the depressing effect of the prospect of upward mobility.

Satisfaction and comparison income

Relative income and its relationship with mental health in UK employees: a conceptual and methodological review.

The econometrics of happiness: Are we underestimating the returns to education and income?

Measuring happiness under interpersonal comparison: An advanced theoretical framework and implications

Multiple salary comparisons, distributive justice, and employee withdrawal.

CONSISTENT COMPARISONS OF REAL INCOMES ACROSS TIME AND SPACE

Income Inequality and Happiness: An Inverted U-Shaped Curve

Where do I rank? Am I happy?: learning income position and subjective-wellbeing in an internet experiment

Relative deprivation and human flourishing: how do upward income comparisons affect health, happiness and life satisfaction?

Income Inequality, Social Comparison, and Happiness in the United States

Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory

Does Life Satisfaction Vary with Time and Income? Investigating the Relationship Among Free Time, Income, and Life Satisfaction

Happiness Studies and the Problem of Interpersonal Comparisons of Satisfaction: Two Histories, Three Approaches

Winding Road Toward the Chinese Dream: The U-shaped Relationship Between Income and Life Satisfaction Among Chinese Migrant Workers

Relative Income and Subjective Well-Being: Examining Multiple Reference Groups of Rural-to-Urban Migrant Workers in China

The Relationship Between Pay Satisfaction and Social Comparison of Chinese Employees

Internet use and job satisfaction

The Determinants of Countercyclical Job Satisfaction in the Public Sector

Lump-sum tax or flat income tax? Welfare implications of taxation policy in the presence of social comparison

Uncovering measurement bias: Differential item functioning by income in the Couples Satisfaction Index.