Abstract:Throughout much of recorded history, societies that assigned rights and duties based on sex were confounded by people with unclear sex. For the sake of maintaining social and legal order in those contexts, legal systems assigned these people to what they figured was the 'most dominant' sex. Then, in mid-19th century United States, a new classification mechanism emerged: sex-assignment surgery, which was imagined by some surgeons to 'fix' one's physical and legal sex status permanently. Other surgeons, however, fiercely opposed the new practice. This article traces the controversy around sex-assignment surgery through three high-profile cases published in US medical journals from 1849 to 1886. Its central argument is that the more general effort to transform surgery into a scientific field helped legitimate the practice of sex-assignment surgery. Although such surgery was subject to intense moral criticism because it was thought to breach the laws of men and nature, over time, these concerns were abandoned or transformed into technical or professional disagreements. In a secondary argument, which helps explain that transformation, this article shows that surgeons gradually became comfortable occupying the epistemic role of sex-classifiers and even sex-makers. That is, whereas sex classification was traditionally a legal task, the new ability to surgically construct one's genitals engendered the notion that sex could be determined and fixed in the clinic in a legally binding manner. Accordingly, I suggest that surgery became an epistemic act of fact-making. This evolution of the consensus around sex-assignment surgery also provides an early origin story for the idea of sex as plastic and malleable by surgeons, thus offering another aspect to the history of plastic sex.

Sex and the Colonial Archive: The Case of “Mariano” Aguilera

[The banishment of the marvellous. Hermaphrodites and sexual mutants in Enlightenment Spain]

The Insubordination Of The Gaze: Marian Icon And Performance In The Mujeres Creando Collective

Explorando la desigualdad social y sexual en contextos urbanos coloniales a través de la enfermedad degenerativa articular: El caso de Mendoza (Argentina)

Why Am I A Woman? Or, Am I? Decolonizing White Feminism and the Latinx Woman Therapist in Academia

“El Todo Poderoso nos ayude, para llegar a lo que deseamos”: homosexuality and Catholicism in Franco’s Spain (1954–1970)

The powers of masculinization in humanitarian storytelling: the case of the surgeon María Gómez Álvarez in the Varsovia Hospital (Toulouse, 1944-1950)

Politics, religion and gender equality in contemporary Mexico: women's sexuality and reproductive rights in a contested secular state

Patriarchal Politics in Pre-Civil War Spain: Prostitution in Ángela Graupera’s Anarcho-feminist Novellas

Considerations about the ambiguous body in Virginia Woolf's Orlando (1928): the dynamics of adrogyny and neo-androgyny.

Community Narrative as a Borderlands Praxis: Anzaldúa's Mestiza Consciousness as Explored in Cortez's Sexile

Debilitated Lifeworlds: Women's Narratives of Forced Sterilization as Delinking from Reproductive Rights

'A woman and now a man': The legitimation of sex-assignment surgery in the United States (1849-1886)

Ambivalence and Representations of Women’s Work in Nineteenth-Century Spanish American Writing, 1861–1896

Desire across borders: markets, migration, and marital HIV risk in rural Mexico

[Sexual revolution and neovitalism. The gestational services in the social reconfiguration, as reproductive, of the queer people]

Subjectivities of female and male physicians in attending victims of sexual violence in university hospitals in Medellín, Antioquia 2021-2022

Educating gender: The economic and spiritual battles over land and Mapuche children in Araucanía, Chile, 1897-1922

Ambivalent Mestizaje

Queer Theory and Biomedical Practice: The Biomedicalization of Sexuality/The Cultural Politics of Biomedicine

Intersecting gender, ethnicity, and sexuality in Arantxa Echevarría's film Carmen & Lola (Spain, 2018)