Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of BRCA1/2 Pathologic Mutation, Variants of Unknown Significance, or Wild Type Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients

Kyung Jin Eoh,Hyung Seok Park,Ji Soo Park,Seung-Tae Lee,Jeongwoo Han,Jung-Yun Lee,Sang Wun Kim,Sunghoon Kim,Young Tae Kim,Eun Ji Nam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2016.135
IF: 5.036
2017-04-15
Cancer Research and Treatment
Abstract:PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients according to <i>BRCA1/2</i> mutation status (mutation, variant of uncertain significance [VUS], or wild type).MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 116 patients whose <i>BRCA1/2</i> genetic test results were available for mutation type and clinical features, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rate. These characteristics were compared according to <i>BRCA1/2</i> mutation status.RESULTS: Thirty-seven (37/116, 31.9%) <i>BRCA1/2</i>mutations were identified (<i>BRCA1</i>, 30; <i>BRCA2</i>, 7). Mutation of c.3627_3628insA (p.Leu1209_Glu1210?fs) in <i>BRCA1</i> was observed in five patients (5/37, 13.5%). Twenty-five patients had <i>BRCA1/2</i> VUSs (25/116, 21.6%). Personal histories of breast cancer were observed in 48.6% of patients with <i>BRCA1/2</i> mutation (18/37), 16.0% of patients with <i>BRCA1/2</i> VUS (4/25), and 7.4% of patients with <i>BRCA</i> wild type (4/54) (p &lt; 0.001). Patients with <i>BRCA1/2</i> mutation showed longer OS than those with <i>BRCA1/2</i> wild type (p=0.005). No significant differences were detected in PFS, OS, or response rates between patients with <i>BRCA1/2</i> VUS and <i>BRCA1/2</i> mutation (p=0.772, p=0.459, and p=0.898, respectively).CONCLUSION: Patientswith <i>BRCA1/2</i> mutation had longer OS than thosewith <i>BRCA1/2</i>wild type. Patients with <i>BRCA1/2</i> mutation and <i>BRCA1/2</i> VUS displayed similar prognoses.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?