Abstract:Thoracic injury is one of the predominant types of severe injuries in frontal accidents. The assessment of the injury risk to the thorax in the current frontal impact test procedures is based on the uni-axial chest deflection measured in the dummy Hybrid III. Several studies have shown that criteria based on the linear chest potentiometer are not sensitive enough to distinguish between different restraint systems, and cannot indicate asymmetric chest loading, which has been shown to correlate to increased injury risk. Furthermore, the measurement is sensitive to belt position on the dummy chest. The objective of this study was to evaluate the optical multipoint chest deflection measurement system ‘RibEye’ in frontal impact sled tests. Therefore the sensitivity of the RibEye system to different restraint system parameters was investigated. Furthermore, the issue of signal drop out at the 6th rib was investigated in this study. A series of sled tests were conducted with the RibEye system in the Hybrid III 50%. The sled environment consisted of a rigid seat and a standard production three-point seat belt system . Rib deflections were recorded with the RibEye system and additionally with the standard chest potentiometer. The tests were carried out at crash pulses of two different velocities (30 km/h and 64 km/h). The tests were conducted with different belt routing to investigate the sensitivity of chest deflection measurements to belt position on the dummy chest. Furthermore, different restraint system parameters were investigated (force limiter level, with or without pretensioning) to evaluate if the RibEye measurements provide additional information to distinguish between restraint system configurations. The results showed that with the RibEye system it was possible to identify the effect of belt routing in more detail. The chest deflections measured with the standard chest potentiometer as well as the maximum deflection measured by RibEye allowed the distinction to be made between different force limiter levels. The RibEye system was also able to clearly show the asymmetric deflection of the rib cage due to belt loading. In some configurations, differences of more than 15 mm were observed between the left and side areas of the chest. Furthermore, the abdomen insert was identified as source of the problem of signal drop out at the 6th rib. Possible solutions are discussed. In conclusion, the RibEye system provided valuable additional information regarding the assessment of restraint systems. It has the potential to enable the evaluation of thoracic injury risk due to asymmetric loading. Further investigations with the RibEye should be extended to tests in a vehicle environment, which include a vehicle seat and other restraint system components such as an airbag.

Comparison of chest injury measures of hybrid III dummy

Heavy vehicle frontal sled crash test analysis – chest deflection response in the Hybrid III dummy

The Utility of Hybrid III and THOR Chest Deflection for Discriminating Between Standard and Force-Limiting Belt Systems

THE LOAD PATH FROM UPPER LEGS TO CHEST IN THE HYBRID III DUMMY; EXPERIMENTS AND SIMULATIONS

Elimination of rib stiffness difference for a Hybrid-III dummy in frontal crash test

The Effects of Inboard Shoulder Belt and Lap Belt Loadings on Chest Deflection

Response Comparison for the Hybrid III, THOR Mod Kit with SD-3 Shoulder, and PMHS in a Simulated Frontal Crash

Evaluation of the Hybrid III 5th Female Modified Chest Jacket & Spine Box

Comparison of the Injury Mechanism between Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women Vehicle Passengers Using Car Crash Test Dummies

Dynamics response and injury assessment of Hybrid-III thorax subjected to oblique impact

Evaluation of the Thoracic Deflection Measurement System ‘Ribeye’ in the Hybrid III 50% in Frontal Sled Tests

Comparison of Hybrid III and THOR dummies in paired small overlap tests

Comparative Evaluation of the Q3 and Hybrid III 3-Year-Old Dummies in Biofidelity and Static Out-of-Position Airbag Tests

Analysis of the Effect of Infant Carrier’s Webbing Tension on 18-month-old Child Occupant’s Chest Accelerations in Frontal Crash Accidents Based on Experimental Validations

A comparative analysis between a newly Malaysian size ATD and the current Hybrid III ATD in frontal impact

Improving Hybrid III Injury Assessment in Steering Wheel Rim to Chest Impacts Using Responses from Finite Element Hybrid III and Human Body Model

Evaluation of Hybrid III and THOR-M neck kinetics and injury risk under various restraint conditions during full-scale frontal sled tests

Injury effects of knee airbags on Chinese human dummy

Influence of Restraint Load on Injury Biomechanics in Frontal Impact Based on Dummy Test

The Effect of Constrained Hip-Joint Design on Crash Dummy Responses

Numerical Low-Back Booster Analysis on a 6-Year-Old Infant during a Frontal Crash Test