Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to ask the question – does mass customization really hold the key to customer value? It is argued that while mass customization can, and often does, increase the value of an offering, it is not always the case. In other words, mass customization does not represent the best strategy for all firms in all cases. Neoclassical economists tend to examine the concept of value in terms of utility. Utility is a measure of satisfaction a consumer receives from consumption of goods or services. Utility theory states that consumers spend their income to maximize their satisfaction or utility (Bowman and Ambrosini 2000). In this light, the concept of value delves deeper into the reasons behind consumer choice; in other words, how do consumers decide which offering will bestow maximum utility? For example, Zeithaml incorporates the notion of utility in her definition but goes further to encompass the basis on which utility is assessed, i.e. through what is given and what is received. Neoclassical economists tend to examine the concept of value in terms of utility. Utility is a measure of satisfaction a consumer receives from consumption of goods or services. Utility theory states that consumers spend their income to maximize their satisfaction or utility (Bowman and Ambrosini 2000). In this light, the concept of value delves deeper into the reasons behind consumer choice; in other words, how do consumers decide which offering will bestow maximum utility? For example, Zeithaml incorporates the notion of utility in her definition but goes further to encompass the basis on which utility is assessed, i.e. through what is given and what is received. It is critical that manufacturing firms understand whether their customers (existing and potential) really do value customization. The paper introduces the responsive agility tool that may provide the basis for an informed decision. The tool differentiates a number of value criteria and a method of selecting between them. Further, the tool identifies four levels of customization distinguished by secondary value criteria. We provide a case study demonstrating how the tool may operate in practice. The case study suggests that the tool may effectively differentiate customer types according to their value criteria. Finally the paper proposes that a value judgement is dependent on the negotiated process between a manufacturer and customer.

Seven Steps Manufacturers Must Take to Begin Offering Mass Customization to Their Customers

Study on Implementation Method of Mass Customization Based on its Extenics Model

Mass customization: the key to customer value?

Combining Internal Functional Integration with Product Modularization and Supply Chain Alignment for Achieving Mass Customization

Fashion Apparel Industry 4.0 and Smart Mass Customization Approach for Clothing Product Design

Study on Mass Customization and Its Actualization

Research On Enterprise Management Information System For Mass Customization

Mass Customization: the Role of Consumer Preference Measurement, Manufacturing Flexibility and Customer Participation

Affective and Cognitive Design for Mass Personalization: Status and Prospect

Main Types and Implementation Methods of Apparel Mass Customization

Mass Customization and Its Knowledge Management

Model for Management Software Mass Customization

A hybrid configuration design approach for mass customization

Smart Factories for Mass Individualization

Mass Customization: the Main Production Mode in Future

Study on the Product Design for Mass Customization

Mass Customization Methods of the Managerial Software

The need for individualization: An open innovation perspective on the case for customized products

Impacts of Industry 4.0 on the Specific Case of Mass Customization Through Modeling and Simulation Approach

Study on mass customization and its model

Study on System Optimization Method for the Actualization of Mass Customization