Rethinking Attachment Theory

Tsachi Ein-Dor,Gilad Hirschberger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416650684
IF: 7.867
2016-08-01
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Abstract:Bowlby’s attachment theory has stimulated research covering a variety of topics related to individual and relational well-being, such as courtship, mate selection, motivations, emotional responses, cognitions, dreams, values, and psychopathology. This research has contributed greatly to the understanding of individual differences in mental health but at the same time has gradually lost touch with the original evolutionary essence of attachment theory. In this article, we revisit Bowlby’s original conceptualization and argue that although attachment styles relate to many different aspects of people’s lives, their primary function is to promote survival. Accordingly, we present social-defense theory and illustrate how different attachment orientations work in synergy to promote group survival, such that a social group comprising members with different attachment patterns has clear adaptive advantages over a homogeneous group of securely attached individuals. We therefore challenge the axiomatic view of insecure attachment as a psychological liability, contending that each attachment disposition has specific adaptive advantages. In making this argument, we extend the scope of attachment theory and research by considering a broader range of adaptive functions of insecure attachment strategies, and present data to support our argument.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?