Abstract:MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. In animals, this regulation is achieved via base-pairing with partially complementary sequences on mainly 3' UTR region of messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Computational approaches that predict miRNA target interactions (MTIs) facilitate the process of narrowing down potential targets for experimental validation. The availability of new datasets of high-throughput, direct MTIs has led to the development of machine learning (ML) based methods for MTI prediction. To train an ML algorithm, it is beneficial to provide entries from all class labels (i.e., positive and negative). Currently, no high-throughput assays exist for capturing negative examples. Therefore, current ML approaches must rely on either artificially generated or inferred negative examples deduced from experimentally identified positive miRNA-target datasets. Moreover, the lack of uniform standards for generating such data leads to biased results and hampers comparisons between studies. In this comprehensive study, we collected methods for generating negative data for animal miRNAs–target interactions and investigated their impact on the classification of true human MTIs. Our study relies on training ML models on a fixed positive dataset in combination with different negative datasets and evaluating their intra- and cross-dataset performance. As a result, we were able to examine each method independently and evaluate ML models' sensitivity to the methodologies utilized in negative data generation. To achieve a deep understanding of the performance results, we analyzed unique features that distinguish between datasets. In addition, we examined whether one-class classification models that utilize solely positive interactions for training are suitable for the task of MTI classification. We demonstrate the importance of negative data in MTI classification, analyze specific methodological characteristics that differentiate negative datasets, and highlight the challenge of ML models generalizing interaction rules from training to testing sets derived from different approaches. This study provides valuable insights into the computational prediction of MTIs that can be further used to establish standards in the field. Gene expression regulation is fundamental for all organisms' development, homeostasis, and environmental adaptation. microRNAs (miRNAs) play a central role in post-transcriptional gene regulation by binding to target mRNAs and repressing their translation or mediating their degradation. Technical challenges in experimental miRNA target identification led to growing interest in computational target prediction. While machine learning (ML) models have shown success in this area, they rely heavily on artificially generated negative examples due to limited experimental data. The diversity of methods for generating negative interactions and the lack of a uniform standardized approach introduce bias and hinder the comparison of results across different studies. In this study, we collected methods for generating negative data for animal miRNAs–target interactions and analyzed their impact on classifying true interactions in humans. Using an ML approach, we evaluated miRNA–target prediction performance within and across negative datasets. We also analyzed unique features distinguishing between the negative datasets to understand the performance results better. Our study shows that negative data is essential for accurately classifying miRNA–target interactions and that ML models struggle to apply what they have learned from the training set when faced with new data derived from different approaches. This study particularly appeals to researchers interested in miRNA–target classification. It emphasizes the need for standardized methods to enhance comparability between studies.

Recording negative results of protein–protein interaction assays: an easy way to deal with the biases and errors of interactomic data sets

Improving Compound-Protein Interaction Prediction by Building Up Highly Credible Negative Samples

–informatics: Integrate negative controls to get the good data

Negative equity - the value of reporting negative results

Dynamics of the discovery process of protein-protein interactions from low content studies

Improving accuracy of protein-protein interaction prediction by considering the converse problem for sequence representation

Co-immunoprecipitations Revisited: an Update on Experimental Concepts and Their Implementation for Sensitive Interactome Investigations of Endogenous Proteins

Computational analyses of high-throughput protein-protein interaction data.

Mining physical protein-protein interactions from the literature

Business Process Measures

Approaches to Detecting False Positives in Yeast Two-Hybrid Systems

Benchmarking the negatives: Effect of negative data generation on the classification of miRNA-mRNA interactions

Correction of a widespread bias in pooled chemical genomics screens improves their interpretability

Improved protein interaction models predict differences in complexes between human cell lines

Rescuing error control in crosslinking mass spectrometry

Diversity in Genetic In Vivo Methods for Protein-Protein Interaction Studies: from the Yeast Two-Hybrid System to the Mammalian Split-Luciferase System

Proteome‐wide assessment of human interactome as a source of capturing domain–motif and domain‐domain interactions

Improved method for detecting protein-protein interactions using proximity ligation assay

Protein-protein interaction assays: eliminating false positive interactions

Biases in the Experimental Annotations of Protein Function and Their Effect on Our Understanding of Protein Function Space

Selecting high-quality negative samples for effectively predicting protein-RNA interactions