Exploring the Content of Discussions on Pain During Ambulatory Oncologist–Patient Encounters (RP113)
Pakhi Goel,Marium Rashid,Nihal E. Mohamed,Jessica Ma,Kathryn I. Pollak,Cardinale B. Smith
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.02.445
IF: 5.576
2024-04-19
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Abstract:Outcomes 1. To describe pain communication practices among oncologists and patients with advanced cancer. 2. To describe the application of REDES and SOCRATES model to pain communication assessment. Key Message We identified several elements of pain–related discussions that may serve as a foundation for developing a framework to objectively assess the quality of oncologist–patient communication around pain. Importance Most patients with advanced cancer struggle with pain, which often remains inadequately treated. Patient and oncologist attitudes and knowledge around pain management are common barriers. But little is known about how both discuss pain. Therefore, we explored pain communication between oncologists and their patients in outpatient encounters. Objective(s) To describe the content of conversations around pain management between patients with advanced cancer and their oncologists. Scientific Methods Utilized This is a secondary analysis from a two-site study of oncologist-patient audio recorded encounters during post-scan visits of patients with advanced cancers. For this analysis, we chose 30 transcripts with pain discussion, purposefully ensuring diversity in cancer type, patient age, gender, and patient/physician race. To guide our inductive content analysis, we used the REDE model for relationship-centered communication and the SOCRATES tool for clinical pain assessment. Four coders identified communication practices related to biopsychosocial pain management. Results We identified several themes: 1) Initiating pain discussions; 2) Exploring pain characteristics to inform the diagnosis; 3) Rapport–building by open–ended questioning, engaging caregivers, listening with minimal interruptions, exploring the impact on quality of life, acknowledging/validating/naming patient emotions, and inviting patients to set goals for pain control; 4) Showing support by discussing test results, efficacy of current pain management, and the need for alternatives, including expert consultation; and 5) Checking for patient understanding, feelings, and commitment to new plan. Conclusion(s) Patients and oncologists use several types of communication practices to discuss pain during outpatient encounters. We plan to devise codes that we can apply quantitatively to assess the prevalence and quality of pain-related communication. Impact By analyzing oncologist–patient discussions regarding pain, we can create a codebook to objectively quantify pain communication that can inform future interventions. Keywords Pain and symptom control/Qualitative and mixed methods research
medicine, general & internal,clinical neurology,health care sciences & services