Abstract:Abstract The European Union’s Green Deal proposal and Farm to Fork strategy call for both demand and supply measures to reduce emissions from the food system. While research clearly illustrates the importance of dietary transitions, impacts of potential supply-side measures are not well understood in relation to competitiveness concerns and leakage effects. This study assesses trade and GHG emission impacts of two supply-side mitigation strategies (intensification vs. extensification) in the EU, UK and Switzerland (EU + 2), against a 2050 baseline featuring healthy/sustainable diets adopted by European consumers. To capture potential leakage effects arising from changing external trade flows, the two supply-side strategies are assessed against three trade policy regimes (i.e. status quo, regional trade liberalization with and without border carbon adjustment), resulting in six scenarios formulated with detailed inputs from the EUCalc model and other literature and simulated with a purported-designed CGE model. Results show that intensification, while improving the EU + 2’s external trade balance, does not reduce emissions in the EU + 2, compared to the baseline. In contrast, extensification leads to a substantial emission abatement that augments reductions from the assumed dietary transition in the baseline, resulting in a combined 31% agricultural emission reduction in EU + 2 during 2014–2050. However, this is at the expense of reduced net agrifood exports by US$25 billion compared to the baseline and significant carbon leakage at a rate of 48% (i.e. nearly half of agricultural emission reduction in the EU + 2 ‘leaked’ to elsewhere). Furthermore, implementing the EU + 2’s prospective regional trade agreements results in increased territorial emissions. Although a border carbon adjustment by the EU + 2 can improve its trade balance and partially shift mitigation burdens to other countries, the associated reductions in global emissions (and carbon leakage) would be marginal. Finally, different trade and emission effects are identified between the crop and livestock sectors, pointing to the desirability of a mixed agriculture system with intensified livestock sector and extensified crop agriculture in the EU + 2 that balances emission reduction goals and competitiveness concerns.

The Paris Agreement and its impact on cattle and food sectors of New Zealand

Impacts of supply-side climate change mitigation practices and trade policy regimes under dietary transition: the case of European agriculture

Mitigation Strategies for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture and Land-Use Change: Consequences for Food Prices

Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agricultural Non-Tariff Measures: Evidence Based on Ad Valorem Equivalent Estimates

Global climate policy impacts on livestock, land use, livelihoods, and food security

The Effectiveness of the International Emissions Trading under the Paris Agreement

Enhancing New Zealand's emissions trading scheme: A comprehensive sector-level assessment for a stronger regulatory framework

Effect of intensification of pastoral farming on greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand

Impacts of Novel Protein Foods on Sustainable Food Production and Consumption: Lifestyle Change and Environmental Policy

Opt-in of the agricultural sector to the European trading scheme for greenhouse gas emissions – a proposal and its possible effects

Cost-effective mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from different dairy systems in the Waikato region of New Zealand

Reducing Deforestation and Trading Emissions: Economic Implications for the Post-Kyoto Carbon Market

CGE Models in Environmental Policy Analysis: A Review and Spanish Case Study

Expanding International GHG Emissions Trading: the Role of Chinese and U.S. Participation

A Quantitative Assessment of the Implications of Including Non-CO2 Emissions in the European ETS

Will International Emissions Trading Help Achieve the Objectives of the Paris Agreement?

Emission Trading Beyond Europe: Linking Schemes in a Post-Kyoto World

The economics of decarbonizing Costa Rica's agriculture, forestry and other land uses sectors

Global Actions under the Paris Agreement: Tracing the Carbon Leakage Flow and Pursuing Countermeasures

The livestock sector can overshoot planetary boundaries and threaten Paris Agreement

The EU’s Gain (Loss) from More Emission Trading Flexibility—A CGE Analysis with Parallel Emission Trading Systems