Evaluating the Importance of Mentoring in Undergraduate Research Education Programs
Nishika T. Edwards,Richard L. Goodwin,Brooks Mcphail,Lauren A. Fowler,Larry Lenard Lowe,Steffani Driggins,Nnenna Chidinma Igwe,Randall H. Harris,Kimberly Shorter,Zhi Gao,Renee J. Chosed,Mohammed K. Khalil,Thomas I. Nathaniel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150241253243
2024-08-04
The International Journal of Aging and Human Development
Abstract:The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, Ahead of Print. The National Institute of Health R25 Research Education Program was evaluated in the second year of implementation. Twelve mentors and 20 underrepresented minority students (URMs) scholars from partnerships and collaborations among five colleges and universities were added to the program to provide a more diverse research experience. Findings reveal that 100% of research mentors agree that the approachableness and accessibility of the program coordinator were beneficial in achieving mentorship goals and objectives. In addition, 85% of the students strongly agreed that the presentation of their research findings and the weekly reflection on goals, identification of accomplishments, and obstacles through the individual development plan were very effective. Of the 23 successfully tracked students for 2 years, six URMs (26.09%) obtained a bachelor's degree and were admitted into a graduate program; two were directly admitted to a PhD program in biomedical sciences.
geriatrics & gerontology,psychology, developmental,gerontology