Abstract:BackgroundAlthough different quality controls have been applied at different stages of the sample preparation and data analysis to ensure both reproducibility and reliability of RNA-seq results, there are still limitations and bias on the detectability for certain differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Whether the transcriptional dynamics of a gene can be captured accurately depends on experimental design/operation and the following data analysis processes. The workflow of subsequent data processing, such as reads alignment, transcript quantification, normalization, and statistical methods for ultimate identification of DEGs can influence the accuracy and sensitivity of DEGs analysis, producing a certain number of false-positivity or false-negativity. Machine learning (ML) is a multidisciplinary field that employs computer science, artificial intelligence, computational statistics and information theory to construct algorithms that can learn from existing data sets and to make predictions on new data set. ML–based differential network analysis has been applied to predict stress-responsive genes through learning the patterns of 32 expression characteristics of known stress-related genes. In addition, the epigenetic regulation plays critical roles in gene expression, therefore, DNA and histone methylation data has been shown to be powerful for ML-based model for prediction of gene expression in many systems, including lung cancer cells. Therefore, it is promising that ML-based methods could help to identify the DEGs that are not identified by traditional RNA-seq method.ResultsWe identified the top 23 most informative features through assessing the performance of three different feature selection algorithms combined with five different classification methods on training and testing data sets. By comprehensive comparison, we found that the model based on InfoGain feature selection and Logistic Regression classification is powerful for DEGs prediction. Moreover, the power and performance of ML-based prediction was validated by the prediction on ethylene regulated gene expression and the following qRT-PCR.ConclusionsOur study shows that the combination of ML-based method with RNA-seq greatly improves the sensitivity of DEGs identification.

Statistical inference for time course RNA-Seq data using a negative binomial mixed-effect model

Negative Binomial Additive Model for RNA-Seq Data Analysis

Differential Expression Analysis for RNAseq Using Poisson Mixed Models.

Theoretical framework for the difference of two negative binomial distributions and its application in comparative analysis of sequencing data

NBLDA: negative binomial linear discriminant analysis for RNA-Seq data

Bayesian Analysis of RNA-Seq Data Using a Family of Negative Binomial Models.

Identifying differentially expressed genes in human acute leukemia and mouse brain microarray datasets utilizing QTModel

Novel Statistical Framework to Identify Differentially Expressed Genes Allowing Transcriptomic Background Differences

A two-step strategy for detecting differential gene expression in cDNA microarray data

EBSeq-HMM: a Bayesian Approach for Identifying Gene-Expression Changes in Ordered RNA-seq Experiments

UMI-count modeling and differential expression analysis for single-cell RNA sequencing

Identifying Differentially Spliced Genes from Two Groups of Rna-Seq Samples

NBBt-test: a versatile method for differential analysis of multiple types of RNA-seq data

QNB: differential RNA methylation analysis for count-based small-sample sequencing data with a quad-negative binomial model

Impulse Model-Based Differential Expression Analysis of Time Course Sequencing Data

DEsingle for Detecting Three Types of Differential Expression in Single-Cell RNA-seq Data

Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation

Detecting Differential Expression from RNA-seq Data with Expression Measurement Uncertainty

A sparse negative binomial mixture model for clustering RNA-seq count data

RNA-seq assistant: machine learning based methods to identify more transcriptional regulated genes

A Unified Model for Joint Normalization and Differential Gene Expression Detection in RNA-Seq Data.