Management of patients after recovering from acute severe biliary pancreatitis

Georgia Dedemadi,Manolis Nikolopoulos,Ioannis Kalaitzopoulos,George Sgourakis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i34.7708
IF: 5.374
2016-01-01
World Journal of Gastroenterology
Abstract:Cholelithiasis is the most common cause of acute pancreatitis, accounting 35%-60% of cases. Around 15%-20% of patients suffer a severe attack with high morbidity and mortality rates. As far as treatment is concerned, the optimum method of late management of patients with severe acute biliary pancreatitis is still contentious and the main question is over the correct timing of every intervention. Patients after recovering from an acute episode of severe biliary pancreatitis can be offered alternative options in their management, including cholecystectomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincterotomy, or no definitive treatment. Delaying cholecystectomy until after resolution of the inflammatory process, usually not earlier than 6 wk after onset of acute pancreatitis, seems to be a safe policy. ERCP and sphincterotomy on index admission prevent recurrent episodes of pancreatitis until cholecystectomy is performed, but if used for definitive treatment, they can be a valuable tool for patients unfit for surgery. Some patients who survive severe biliary pancreatitis may develop pseudocysts or walled-off necrosis. Management of pseudocysts with minimally invasive techniques, if not therapeutic, can be used as a bridge to definitive operative treatment, which includes delayed cholecystectomy and concurrent pseudocyst drainage in some patients. A management algorithm has been developed for patients surviving severe biliary pancreatitis according to the currently published data in the literature.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to conduct the best management after patients recover from acute severe biliary pancreatitis. Specifically, the paper explores the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment options, including cholecystectomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincterotomy, conservative management, and interventions for pseudocysts and walled - off necrosis. The main focus of the paper is to determine the best timing of these treatment options, especially for those patients at risk of serious complications or not suitable for surgery. The paper points out that there is still controversy regarding the long - term management of patients with acute severe biliary pancreatitis, especially in the choice of treatment timing. For example, delaying cholecystectomy until the inflammatory process has completely subsided (usually at least 6 weeks after the onset of acute pancreatitis) is considered a relatively safe strategy. Meanwhile, ERCP and sphincterotomy can prevent the recurrence of biliary pancreatitis when used at the time of initial admission, but for patients who cannot undergo surgery, these methods are also valuable as a final treatment. In addition, the paper also discusses the management of pseudocysts and walled - off necrosis, which are relatively common in some patients who survive severe biliary pancreatitis. For these complications, minimally invasive techniques can serve as a bridge to final surgical treatment or be used in combination with delayed cholecystectomy to reduce the possibility of a second operation. In summary, the paper aims to propose a management algorithm for patients recovering from acute severe biliary pancreatitis through a comprehensive analysis of existing literature data, in order to provide guidance for clinicians and optimize patients' treatment plans.