Five Views on the National Front Budget

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090919900206

1990-04-01

Abstract:The presentation of the Annual Budget every year can be viewed as the communication of certain important measures of public policy by a democratically elected government to various stakeholders in the country. Therefore, the event inevitably raises hopes of new perspectives and new measures from the policy makers to deal with short term as well as long term issues related to the process of economic development. The 1990-91 budget is no exception. However, it can be said that this budget is somewhat more significant than earlier budgets not only because it is the first budget of the newly elected National Front Government but also because it gives an opportunity for various stakeholders to get a glimpse of the economic and political thinking of the new government. It is precisely for this reason that we are featuring an analysis of the budget in this issue of Vikalpa. In order to facilitate the process of gaining valuable insights into the budget, five eminent academics have come forward to share their views with our readers. Professor Oza, for instance, argues that while the budget may be termed pragmatic, it is by no means a bold, path-breaking economic event. Professor Mody analyses the debt-financing aspect and comes to the conclusion that public debt should grow at a rate equal to the rate of growth of the economy minus the re~l rate of interest. Professor Srivastava adds another dimension to the debate by examining the extent to which the budget is oriented to the rural sector. Professor Venkiteswaran presents an interesting analysis of the process of restructuring of tax laws. In his opinion, this budget continues the process which was initiated earlier. Professor Ramesh Gupta rounds off the discussion by focusing on the withdrawal of investment allowance. He examines empirically whether this tax measure is a burden or a benefit to the corporate sector.