Long-term psychosocial impact of alternative management policies in women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: a randomised controlled trial
L Sharp,S Cotton,N Gray,M Avis,I Russell,L Walker,N Waugh,D Whynes,C Woolley,A Thornton,L Smart,M Cruickshank,J Little,TOMBOLA Group,Maggie Cruickshank,Graeme Murray,David Parkin,Louise Smart,Eric Walker,Norman Waugh,Mark Avis,Claire Chilvers,Katherine Fielding,Rob Hammond,David Jenkins,Jane Johnson,Keith Neal,Ian Russell,Rashmi Seth,Dave Whynes,Ian Duncan,Alistair Robertson,Julian Little,Linda Sharp,Breda Anthony,Sarah Bell,Adrienne Bowie,Katrina Brown,Joe Brown,Kheng Chew,Claire Cochran,Seonaidh Cotton,Jeannie Dean,Kate Dunn,Jane Edwards,David Evans,Julie Fenty,Al Finlayson,Marie Gallagher,Nicola Gray,Maureen Heddle,Alison Innes,Debbie Jobson,Mandy Keillor,Jayne MacGregor,Sheona Mackenzie,Amanda Mackie,Gladys McPherson,Ike Okorocha,Morag Reilly,Joan Rodgers,Alison Thornton,Rachel Yeats,Lindyanne Alexander,Lindsey Buchanan,Susan Henderson,Tine Iterbeke,Susanneke Lucas,Gillian Manderson,Sheila Nicol,Gael Reid,Carol Robinson,Trish Sandilands,Marg Adrian,Ahmed Al-Sahab,Elaine Bentley,Hazel Brook,Claire Bushby,Rita Cannon,Brenda Cooper,Ruth Dowell,Mark Dunderdale,Gabrawi,Li Guo,Lisa Heideman,Steve Jones,Salli Lawson,Zoë Philips,Christopher Platt,Shakuntala Prabhakaran,John Rippin,Rose Thompson,Elizabeth Williams,Claire Woolley,Kirsten Harrild,John Norrie,Nicholas Day,Theresa Marteau,Mahesh Parmar,Julietta Patnick,Ciaran Woodman,Doug Altman,Sue Moss,Michael Wells,Leslie Walker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6606042
2011-01-18
Abstract:Background: The debate continues regarding the best management for women with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology attending colposcopy. We compared psychosocial outcomes of alternative management policies in these women. Methods: In all, 989 women, aged 20-59 years, with low-grade abnormal cytology, were randomised to immediate large loop excision (LLETZ) or two to four targeted punch biopsies taken immediately with recall for LLETZ if these showed cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia 2/3. At 6 weeks after the last procedure, women completed the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and the impact of event scale (IES). At 12, 18, 24 and 30 months post recruitment, women completed the HADS and process outcome specific measure (POSM). Prevalence of significant depression (≥ 8), significant anxiety (≥ 11) and distress (≥ 9) and median POSM scores were compared between arms. Multivariate odds ratios (ORs) for immediate LLETZ vs biopsy and recall were computed. Results: Over the entire follow-up, there was no significant difference between arms in cumulative prevalence or risk of significant depression (OR=0.78, 95% CI 0.52-1.17) or significant anxiety (OR=0.83, 95% CI 0.57-1.19). At 6 weeks post procedure, distress did not differ significantly between arms. At later time points, 8-11% had significant depression and 14-16% had significant anxiety but with no differences between arms. The POSM scores did not differ between the arms. Conclusions: There is no difference in long- or short-term psychosocial outcomes of immediate LLETZ and punch biopsies with selective recall.