Differences between parent- and teacher-reported executive functioning behaviors after traumatic injuries
Lisa M. GiesJames D. LynchKellyAnn BonannoNanhua ZhangKeith Owen YeatesH. Gerry TaylorShari L. Wadea Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center,Cincinnati,OH,USAb Department of Psychology,University of Cincinnati,Cincinnati,OH,USAc Center for ADHD,Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center,Cincinnati,OH,USAd Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology,Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center,Cincinnati,OH,USAe College of Medicine,University of Cincinnati,Cincinnati,OH,USAf Department of Psychology,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute,and Hotchkiss Brain Institute,University of Calgary,Alberta,CA,USAg Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital,and Department of Pediatrics,The Ohio State University,Columbus,OH,USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2314957
IF: 2.597
2024-02-14
Child Neuropsychology
Abstract:Deficits in executive functioning (EF) behaviors are very common following pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) and can linger well after acute injury recovery. Raters from multiple settings provide information that may not be appreciated otherwise. We examined differences between parent and teacher ratings of EF using data examining longitudinal outcomes following pediatric TBI in comparison to orthopedic injury (OI). We used linear mixed models to determine the association of rater type and injury type with scores on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning (BRIEF). After controlling for demographic variables, rater type and injury type accounted for a small but significant proportion of the variance in EF. Teachers' ratings on the BRIEF were significantly higher than parent ratings for global EF and metacognition, but not for behavior regulation, regardless of injury type, indicating greater EF concerns. All BRIEF ratings, whether from teachers or parents, were higher for children with TBI than for those with OI. Results suggest that parents and teachers provide unique information regarding EF following traumatic injuries and that obtaining ratings from persons who observe children at school as well as at home can result in a better understanding of situation-specific variability in outcomes.
clinical neurology