Abstract:Agree in morphology, on the other hand, is extravagance, at least linguistically. We could go on like this forever. The fact that a language does not express a certain feature in its Physical Form does not mean that it is absent from its Logical Form: • The fact that Russian does not have a copula in the present tense, does not mean that a clause like Boris glup ‘Boris [is] stupid’ lacks tense and finiteness. • The fact that e.g. Japanese, Russian, Estonian and Finnish have no articles does not mean that they lack definiteness (cf. Lyons 1999; see also e.g. Chesterman 1991 on definiteness in Finnish and Hiietam 2003 on Estonian definiteness). • The fact that e.g. the Germanic languages have no future tense inflection of verbs does not mean that these languages lack future tense in clauses like John leaves on Saturday. • The fact that PRO-infinitives in e.g. English have no overt marking of tense or person does not mean that these features are semantically absent from English PRO-infinitives. And so on, and so forth. In spite of the Chomskian ‘cognitive revolution’, linguistics is still heavily burdened by the positivist heritage of 20 century pre-Chomskian structuralism. In science, however, it is not a virtue to only believe what one ‘sees’. We do not ‘see’ atoms, electrons or quarks, black holes or antimatter. Linguists are accustomed to the ‘Saussurean arbitrariness’ of the soundmeaning pairing at the lexical level. We do not generally assume that Italian tavola relates more naturally or directly to the meaning ‘table’ than Russian stol. In contrast, many linguists seem to strongly believe in ‘sensible morphology’. However, there is no such thing. Morphology is radically ‘nonsensical’ in the sense that it never expresses any underlying LF differences between languages. The reason is simple: there are no such differences. 5 In contrast, of course, meaningful distinctions often relate to morphological distinctions language-internally. Such language-internal relations are similar to those between diseases and symptoms: even though diseases often have diagnostic symptoms some diseases have no clear symptoms, and, also, many symptoms are common to two or more diseases. See the discussion of case from this perspective in Sigurðsson (in press a). 6 Evidently, linguistic extravagance is socially important, depending on factors we have very little knowledge of.

Structure vs. use in heritage language

Syntactic optionality in heritage Spanish: How patterns of exposure and use affect clitic climbing

Syntactic Optionality in Heritage Language Use: Clause Type Preferences of German Heritage Speakers in a Majority English Context

Heritage Languages: Language Acquired, Language Lost, Language Regained

Behavioral Signatures of Memory Resources for Language: Looking beyond the Lexicon/Grammar Divide

Lexically-specific syntactic restrictions in second-language speakers

Being a heritage speaker matters: the role of markedness in subject-verb person agreement in Italian

‘Qué barbaridad, son latinos y deberían saber español primero’: Language Ideology, Agency, and Heritage Language Insecurity across Immigrant Generations

Path and rate of development in child heritage speakers: Evidence from Greek subject/object form and placement

The structure of age: in search of barriers to second language acquisition

Structural Priming Demonstrates Abstract Grammatical Representations in Multilingual Language Models

Beyond age: exploring ultimate attainment in heritage speakers and late L2 learners

Case marking is different in monolingual and heritage Bosnian in digitally elicited oral texts

The Fine Structure of the Comparative

Heritage language development in Spanish-English-speaking preschoolers: Influences on growth and challenges in the first year of English-only instruction

Can Heritage Speakers Predict Lexical and Morphosyntactic Information in Reading?

Language activation in dual language schools: the development of subject-verb agreement in the English and Spanish of heritage speaker children

Local Structure Matters Most in Most Languages

Language Analytic Ability, Print Exposure, Memory and Comprehension of Complex Syntax by Adult Native Speakers

The Silence Principle.

Bilingual Children Demonstrate Variation Within Shared Narrative Macrostructure