Fate of small pancreatic cysts (<3 cm) after long-term follow-up: analysis of significant radiologic characteristics and proposal of follow-up strategies

Heera Yoen,Jung Hoon Kim,Dong Ho Lee,Su Joa Ahn,Jeong Hee Yoon,Joon Koo Han
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4589-7
IF: 7.034
2016-09-21
European Radiology
Abstract:ObjectiveTo describe the natural history of pancreatic cysts after long-term follow-up, with an emphasis on the identifying indicators of indolent lesions.MethodsWe retrospectively sampled 95 patients with 149 cysts &lt;3 cm detected by CT from 2003 to 2004, and followed them for more than five years (mean 117.5 ± 18.8 months). Two radiologists reviewed the initial CT images, then recorded changes after the follow-up. We compared the cysts’ initial characteristics between the surgery and non-surgery patient groups, and also between non-benign lesions and benign lesions.ResultsTwelve of the 95 patients, who among them had 16 cysts, underwent surgery. Of the 133 cysts in the 83 nonsurgical patients, 57 cysts (42.9 %) enlarged, although only five cysts increased to larger than 3 cm at the end of observation. The initial size of the cyst was significantly larger in the surgery group than non-surgery group. Also, according to cyst-based analysis, ductal communication, dilatation, and shape correlated with those of non-benign cysts and the non-surgical group. No cysts &lt; 15 mm and without p-duct change showed a significant change within three years.ConclusionSmall pancreatic cysts, without p-duct change, and without a pleomorphic or clubbed shape, may be followed for a longer interval than current consensus.Key Points• Almost all small cysts &lt; 3 cm were indolent in long term observation.• No cysts &lt; 15 mm, without p-duct change showed significant change within 3 years.• Cyst size, ductal change and shape can be useful in predicting progress.• Only cysts with IPMN- like features and p-duct change need follow-up with cautions.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?