Abstract:BACKGROUND: Health care social media used for health information exchange and emotional communication involves different types of users, including patients, caregivers, and health professionals. However, it is difficult to identify different stakeholders because user identification data are lacking due to privacy protection and proprietary interests. Therefore, identifying the concerns of different stakeholders and how they use health care social media when confronted with huge amounts of health-related messages posted by users is a critical problem.OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a new content analysis method using text mining techniques applied in health care social media to (1) identify different health care stakeholders, (2) determine hot topics of concern, and (3) measure sentiment expression by different stakeholders.METHODS: We collected 138,161 messages posted by 39,606 members in lung cancer, diabetes, and breast cancer forums in the online community MedHelp.org over 10 years (January 2007 to October 2016) as experimental data. We used text mining techniques to process text data to identify different stakeholders and determine health-related hot topics, and then analyzed sentiment expression.RESULTS: We identified 3 significantly different stakeholder groups using expectation maximization clustering (3 performance metrics: Rand=0.802, Jaccard=0.393, Fowlkes-Mallows=0.537; P<.001), in which patients (24,429/39,606, 61.68%) and caregivers (12,232/39,606, 30.88%) represented the majority of the population, in contrast to specialists (2945/39,606, 7.43%). We identified 5 significantly different health-related topics: symptom, examination, drug, procedure, and complication (Rand=0.783, Jaccard=0.369, Fowlkes-Mallows=0.495; P<.001). Patients were concerned most about symptom topics related to lung cancer (536/1657, 32.34%), drug topics related to diabetes (1883/5904, 31.89%), and examination topics related to breast cancer (8728/23,934, 36.47%). By comparison, caregivers were more concerned about drug topics related to lung cancer (300/2721, 11.03% vs 109/1657, 6.58%), procedure topics related to breast cancer (3952/13,954, 28.32% vs 5822/23,934, 24.33%), and complication topics (4449/25,701, 17.31% vs 4070/31,495, 12.92%). In addition, patients (9040/36,081, 25.05%) were more likely than caregivers (2659/18,470, 14.39%) and specialists (17,943/83,610, 21.46%) to express their emotions. However, patients' sentiment intensity score (2.46) was lower than those of caregivers (4.66) and specialists (5.14). In particular, for caregivers, negative sentiment scores were higher than positive scores (2.56 vs 2.18), with the opposite among specialists (2.62 vs 2.46). Overall, the proportion of negative messages was greater than that of positive messages related to symptom, complication, and examination. The pattern was opposite for drug and procedure topics. A trend analysis showed that patients and caregivers gradually changed their emotional state in a positive direction.CONCLUSIONS: The hot topics of interest and sentiment expression differed significantly among different stakeholders in different disease forums. These findings could help improve social media services to facilitate diverse stakeholder engagement for health information sharing and social interaction more effectively.

From loquacious to reticent: understanding patient health information communication to guide consumer health IT design

To talk or not to talk: exploring culturally diverse patients' health information communication choices

Health Topics on Facebook Groups: Content Analysis of Posts in Multiple Sclerosis Communities

Representation of health conditions on Facebook: content analysis and evaluation of user engagement

‘What was your blood sugar reading this morning?’ Representing diabetes self-management on Facebook

Using social media data in diabetes care: bridging the conceptual gap between health providers and the network population

A Post a Day Keeps the Doctor Away: Sharing Personal Information on Self-Diagnosis Platforms

The role of social media for patients and consumer health. Contribution of the IMIA Consumer Health Informatics Working Group

Understanding Health Care Social Media Use From Different Stakeholder Perspectives: A Content Analysis of an Online Health Community

When People With Chronic Conditions Turn to Peers on Social Media to Obtain and Share Information: Systematic Review of the Implications for Relationships With Health Care Professionals

The Role of Technology in Online Health Communities: A Study of Information-Seeking Behavior

Patient Use of Email, Facebook, and Physician Websites to Communicate with Physicians: A National Online Survey of Retail Pharmacy Users

Communicating Health Literacy on Prescription Medications on Social Media: In-depth Interviews With "Patient Influencers"

Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication

Characterizing Consumer Behavior in Leveraging Social Media for E-Patient and Health-Related Activities

Cardiac Patients' Experiences and Perceptions of Social Media: Mixed-Methods Study

Computer-Mediated Experiences of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Harnessing the Web: How E-Health and E-Health Literacy Impact Young Adults' Perceptions of Online Health Information

What motivates health information exchange in social media? The roles of the social cognitive theory and perceived interactivity

Bridging the Digital Health Divide: Characterizing Patient Portal Users and Nonusers in the U.S

Young Adults’ Use of Different Social Media Platforms for Health Information: Insights From Web-Based Conversations