Function Beyond RNA Splicing for RBFox Family Members in Heart
Chen Gao,Jing Hu,Chaoliang Wei,Yunhua Esther Hsiao,Shuxun Ren,Yuanchao Xue,Yu Zhou,Jianlin Zhang,Ju Chen,Xinshu Xiao,Xiang-Dong Fu,Yi Xing,Yibin Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.07.050
2017-01-01
Abstract:Background: RNA metabolism, from synthesis, processing, translation to degradation is an integrated part of gene regulation that ultimately determines the overall cardiac transcriptome complexity. The RBFox family members of RNA splicing regulator, including RBFox1 and 2, are dramatically downregulated in the diseased hearts and are found to have critical roles in cardiac development and pathological remodeling. In addition to expected alternative RNA splicing and transcription regulation targeted by the nuclear RBFox1 and RBFox2, both genes also produce cytosolic localized splicing variants, raising interesting questions about additional roles in the cytosol for RNA processing. Goal and Methods: This study investigated the functional impact of two RBFox family members- RBFox1 and RBFox2 in cytosol in cardiomyocytes. Results: Cardiac specific KO of RBFox1 exacerbated pressure-overload induced heart failure and fibrotic remodeling while cardiac specific expression of the RBFox1 cytosolic isoform (RBFox1c) in mouse heart was sufficient to protect against pressure-overload induced cardiac dysfunction and fibrotic remodeling. RNA-seq analysis in cultured myocytes revealed a significant suppression of proinflammatory genes upon RBFox1c expression, and motif analysis identified significant enrichment of RBFox binding sites in the 3’UTR of the affected genes mRNA. By both mass-spec and co-IP analysis, we also detected specific interaction between RBFox1c and RNA degradation complex protein, implicating a molecular link between RBFox1c and targeted RNA degradation. For RBFox2, cardiac specific and inducible KO of RBFox2 in adult mouse hearts was sufficient to trigger dilated cardiomyopathy with disorganized T-tubules structure associated with targeted inhibition of Jph2 expression at protein level but not at mRNA level. Loss of RBFox2 repressed Jph2 protein expression due to competitive binding on the Jph2 3’-UTR with miR34a. Inactivating miR34a partially rescued heart failure induced by RBFox2 KO in heart by restoring Jph2 expression, normalizing cardiac function and T-tubule organization. Conclusion: Both RBFox1 and RBFox2 have potentially important function beyond splicing regulation in cardiac muscle cells. In cytosol, RBFox1 suppresses inflammatory gene expression and cardiac fibrosis by binding to 3’UTR, and potentially modulating target mRNA stability. In contrast, RBFox2 alters Jph2 protein expression by interacting with Jph2 3’UTR and competing with miR34a mediated gene suppression. Therefore, loss of RBFox1 and 2 in diseased heart contribute to different features of cardiac pathology via both nuclear and cytosolic function at different levels of RNA metabolism.