Global Health Education in Gastroenterology Fellowship: A National Survey

Pichamol Jirapinyo,Rachel S. Hunt,Ying P. Tabak,Deborah D. Proctor,Frederick L. Makrauer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4308-x
2016-10-28
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Abstract:BackgroundInterest in global health (GH) education is increasing across disciplines.AimsTo assess exposure to and perception of GH training among gastroenterology fellows and program directors across the USA.MethodsDesign: Electronic survey study. Setting: The questionnaire was circulated to accredited US gastroenterology fellowship programs, with the assistance of the American Gastroenterological Association. Participants: Gastroenterology program directors and fellows.ResultsThe questionnaire was returned by 127 respondents (47 program directors, 78 fellows) from 55 training programs (36 % of all training programs). 61 % of respondents had prior experience in GH. 17 % of programs offered GH curriculum with international elective (13 %), didactic (9 %), and research activity (7 %) being the most common. Fellows had adequate experience managing hepatitis B (93 %), cholangiocarcinoma (84 %), and intrahepatic duct stones (84 %). 74, 69 and 68 % reported having little to no experience managing hepatitis E, tuberculosis mesenteritis, or epidemic infectious enteritis, respectively. Most fellows would participate in an elective in an underserved area locally (81 %) or a 4-week elective abroad (71 %), if available. 44 % of fellows planned on working or volunteering abroad after fellowship. Barriers to establishing GH curriculum included funding (94 %), scheduling (88 %), and a lack of standardized objectives (78 %). Lack of interest, however, was not a concern. Fellows (49 %), more than faculty (29 %) (χ2 = 21.9; p = 0.03), believed that GH education should be included in fellowship curriculum.ConclusionsProgram directors and trainees recognize the importance of GH education. However, only 17 % of ACGME-approved fellowship programs offer the opportunity. Global health curriculum may enhance gastroenterology training.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?