Abstract:Memory retrieval affects subsequent memory in ways both positive (e.g., the testing effect) and negative (e.g., retrieval-induced forgetting, RIF). The changes to memory that retrieval produces can be thought of as the encoding consequences of retrieval, examined here with respect to attention. In three experiments, participants first studied category-example word pairs, and then practiced retrieval for half the pairs from one-third of the categories (the R + items) and restudied half the pairs from a different third of the categories (the S + items), while the final third of the categories were in the nonpracticed control condition (the Np items). This was followed in turn by a final test over all categories and examples, including the unpracticed examples from the retrieval-practice and restudied categories (the R- and S- items, respectively). The middle phase (of retrieval practice and restudy) was conducted under full attention (FA) or under divided attention (DA) in which participants also performed a distracting secondary task. DA had little effect on final recall in the retrieval practice (R +) condition but significantly reduced final recall of the restudied (S +) items, producing a net increase in the testing effect relative to the FA condition. RIF (measured as the difference between the R- and Np items) was substantial in the FA condition but was eliminated by DA. This occurred because the final recall of R- items significantly increased in the DA compared to FA condition, a highly unusual result in which distraction actually improved an aspect of memory performance. In sum, DA during retrieval practice dissociated the positive and negative effects of retrieval on subsequent memory, increasing the positive effect, embodied by the testing effect, but decreasing the negative effect, embodied by RIF. The theoretical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Retrieval practice protects memory against acute stress

Retrieval practice improves item memory but not source memory in the context of stress

No Retrieval-Induced Forgetting Under Stress

Acute psychosocial stress during retrieval impairs pattern separation processes on an episodic memory task

Post-retrieval stress impairs subsequent memory depending on hippocampal memory trace reinstatement during reactivation

Acute stress negatively affects object recognition early memory consolidation and memory retrieval unrelated to state-dependency

Mechanisms of Late-Onset Cognitive Decline after Early-Life Stress.

Stress Within A Restricted Time Window Selectively Affects The Persistence Of Long-Term Memory

Attention, the testing effect, and retrieval-induced forgetting: Distraction dissociates the positive and negative effects of retrieval on subsequent memory.

The Effect of Stress on Semantic Memory Retrieval: A Multiverse Analysis

Acute exercise on memory: application of the retrieval-induced forgetting paradigm

Retrograde amnesia for the stress-induced impairment of extinction: time-dependent and not so forgotten

Does retrieving a memory insulate it against memory inhibition? A retroactive interference study

Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism

Neural Correlates of Long-Term Memory Enhancement Following Retrieval Practice

Neural correlates of retrieval-based memory enhancement: An fMRI study of the testing effect

Relearning can eliminate the effect of retrieval-induced forgetting

Memory Retrieval and the Passage of Time: From Reconsolidation and Strengthening to Extinction

Is Retrieval-Induced Forgetting an Inhibitory Process?

The Effect of Acute Stress on LTP and LTD Induction in the Hippocampal CA1 Region of Anesthetized Rats at Three Different Ages

Durability of retrieval-induced forgetting: Effects of different practice schedules