"Blueprint version 2.0": updating public health surveillance for the 21st century
Perry F Smith,James L Hadler,Martha Stanbury,Robert T Rolfs,Richard S Hopkins,CSTE Surveillance Strategy Group,Christopher Braden,Peter Briss,May Chu,Letitia Davis,Alfred DeMaria,Lisa Ferland,Seth Foldy,Karen Foster,Julia Gunn,Janet Hamilton,Katrina Hedberg,Khosrow Heidari,Lesliann Helmus,Monica Huang,Sara Huston,Tim Jones,James Kirkwood,William Lober,Cortland Lohff,Steven Macdonald,Laurene Mascola,Patrick McConnon,Joseph McLaughlin,Pamela Meyer,Stephen Ostroff,Robert Pinner,Judith Qualters,Lakesha Robinson,David Ross,Tom Safranek,Hillard Weinstock,Paula Yoon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e318262906e
Abstract:Rapid changes to the United States public health system challenge the current strategic approach to surveillance. During 2011, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists convened national experts to reassess public health surveillance in the United States and update surveillance strategies that were published in a 1996 report and endorsed by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. Although surveillance goals, historical influences, and most methods have not changed, surveillance is being transformed by 3 influences: public health information and preparedness as national security issues; new information technologies; and health care reform. Each offers opportunities for surveillance, but each also presents challenges that public health epidemiologists can best meet by rigorously applying surveillance evaluation concepts, engaging in national standardization activities driven by electronic technologies and health care reform, and ensuring an adequately trained epidemiology workforce.