Border Disputes Through Ill-Defined Borders: Maritime Territorial Conflicts and Their Impact on Security

Clemens Binder
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46855-6_3
2016-12-10
Abstract:Borders as a mean of territorial demarcation have long been a central notion in international relations and have an important impact on states’ foreign and security policies. Borders are often disputed, and disputes are often more complex on the sea, as a clear definition of sea borders is missing. The United Nations Convention of the Law of the Seas (UNCLOS) attempts to offer a maritime border regime but lacks the mechanisms that a completely functional border regime would require. UNCLOS fails to regulate conflicting claims and border disputes on the sea. This leads to a lack of clarity concerning territorial demarcation and increases the possibility of conflict, which influences security policies. In this chapter, it is argued that in the absence of clear borders states fear their security is compromised as this absence can create incentives for states to act as a territorial expansionist. This is explored in two case studies, the Arctic Sea and the South China Sea. Both cases represent areas where the lack of defined borders causes conflicting interests, especially economic ones, and where tensions are increasing. The cases will be investigated from a realist perspective as examples of a security dilemma.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?