Abstract:Along with the developments of numerous MaOO algorithms in the last decades, comparing the performance of MaOO algorithms with one another is also highly needed. Many studies have attempted to manipulate such comparison to analyze the performance quality of MaOO. In such cases, the weight of importance is critical for evaluating the performance of MaOO algorithms. All evaluation studies for MaOO algorithms have ignored to assign such weight for the target criteria during evaluation process, which plays a key role in the final decision results. Therefore, the weight value of each criterion must be determined to guarantee the accuracy of results in the evaluation process. Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are extremely preferred in solving weighting issues in the evaluation process of MaOO algorithms. Several studies in MCDM have proposed competitive weighting methods. However, these methods suffer from inconsistency issues arising from the high subjectivity of pairwise comparison. The inconsistency rate increases in an exorbitant manner when the number of criteria increases, and the final results are affected. The primary objective of this study is to propose a new method, called a Novel Fuzzy-Weighted Zero-Inconsistency (FWZIC) Method which can determine the weight coefficients of criteria with zero consistency. This method depends on differences in the preference of experts per criterion to compute its significance level in the decision-making process. The proposed FWZIC method comprises five phases for determining the weights of the evaluation criteria: (1) the set of evaluation criteria is explored and defined, (2) the structured expert judgement (SEJ) is used, (3) the expert decision matrix (EDM) is built on the basis of the crossover of criteria and SEJ, (4) a fuzzy membership function is applied to the result of the EDM and (5) the final values of the weight coefficients of the evaluation criteria are computed. The proposed method is applied to the evaluation criteria of MaOO competitive algorithms. The case study consists of more than 50 items distributed amongst the major criteria, subcriteria and indicators. The significant contribution of each item to the algorithm evaluation is determined. Results show that the criteria, subcriteria and their related indicators are weighted without inconsistency. The findings clearly show that the FWZIC method can deal with the inconsistency issue and provide accurate weight values to each criterion.

Criteria weights assessment through prioritizations (WAP) using linear programming techniques and visualizations

Supporting multi-criteria decision-making processes with unknown criteria weights

Predictive and simultaneous weighting of criteria and alternatives (PSWCA) in multi-criteria decision making based on past data

Opinion Weight Criteria Method (OWCM): A New Method for Weighting Criteria With Zero Inconsistency

Simple additive weighting—A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods

An integrated group decision-making framework for assessing S3PRLPs based on MULTIMOORA-WASPAS with q-rung orthopair fuzzy information

An Evaluation of Multiple Objective Decision Support Weighting Techniques in Natural Resource Management

Determining Importance of Many-Objective Optimisation Competitive Algorithms Evaluation Criteria Based on a Novel Fuzzy-Weighted Zero-Inconsistency Method

A cleaner supplier selection model using rate-weight connected vectors processor (RWCVP): Type I

Integrated MADM approach based on extended MABAC method with Aczel–Alsina generalized weighted Bonferroni mean operator

Application of the new simple weight calculation (SIWEC) method in the case study in the sales channels of agricultural products

Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment Method Based on Aczel–Alsina T-Norm and T-Conorm Under Bipolar T-Spherical Fuzzy Information: Design Scheme Selection Application

A Preference Elicitation Approach for the Ordered Weighted Averaging Criterion using Solution Choice Observations

An Integrated Multicriteria Analysis Tool for Evaluating Water Resource Management Strategies

A new multi-criteria decision process to prioritise requirements

Insights into Weighted Sum Sampling Approaches for Multi-Criteria Decision Making Problems

A Hybrid Best-Worst Method (BWM)—Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Approach for Prioritizing Road Safety Improvements

An α-cut intervals based fuzzy best-Worst method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making

Robustness analysis in Multi-Objective Mathematical Programming using Monte Carlo simulation

Inverse Gram Matrix Methods for Prioritization in Analytic Hierarchy Process: Explainability of Weighted Least Squares Optimization Method

A integrating critic-waspas group decision making method under interval-valued q-rung orthogonal fuzzy enviroment